In effect, the Knish is skewering Dr. Schwartz for the same errors in methodology that I have attacked him for in several comments to posts here. But while I have largely concentrated on the Dr. Schwartz's tendancy to quote lone scientific voices as if they were not only the majority but were in fact the only opinion, the Knish gets him for doing the same thing to Torah.
One must wonder how long it will take for idealogues like Dr. Schwartz to realize how seriously their 'arguments' damage the cause they claim to care so deeply for.
The Knish also makes a passing reference to Breslov requiring shechita for fish. What's up with that?