Fight Over Agriprocessors Unpaid Taxes Shows Successor To Be Deceptive
Haredi businessman Hershy Friedman bought Agriprocessors' assets “free and clear” of liability in 2009. The county sued in 2010, claiming that Friedman's company owed approximately $500,000 in taxes for the 2007-2008 tax year that were not paid by Agriprocessors. Friedman's company pointed to the “free and clear” ruling and said it owed nothing. But in January 2012, the same judge who allowed Friedman's company to buy Agriprocessors "free and clear" of all liabilities found that Friedman's company knew about the unpaid tax bill then but hid its existence from the court. Therefore, the judge ruled, Friedman's company was “not a good faith purchaser” and the county still was owed the money.
Hershy Friedman at Agri Star in Postville, Iowa
Northeast Iowa city, county still fighting Agri Star
Mike Wiser • Quad City Times
POSTVILLE, Iowa — Four years after an immigration raid on a kosher slaughterhouse put a national spotlight on the town of Postville, about 140 miles northwest of the Quad-Cities, the relationship between the city, its biggest employer and the county hardly could be worse.
In 2010, officials in Allamakee County filed a half-million-dollar lawsuit against Agri Star Meat & Poultry for taxes incurred when the processor was known as Agriprocessors and under different ownership.
Two years of courtroom wrangling later, the county has racked up a legal bill of nearly $140,000 to pursue its claim, but — despite a ruling in the county’s favor — a final resolution still seems far off.
Then in March of this year, county officials refused to sign off on an incentive package for Agri Star, essentially stopping the company from obtaining close to $1 million in tax abatements through the Iowa Economic Development Authority.
“It’s outrageous,” said Doug Gross, the 2002 Republican nominee for governor and an attorney with the Des Moines law firm BrownWinick that represents Agri Star’s owner. “These are two totally unrelated issues, and the county is holding the incentives hostage for some type of leverage in the tax litigation.”
But the ferocity with which Agri Star has fought the tax claim, despite a ruling by a federal judge that the county is owed the money, has left a bad taste in the mouths of some Postville residents.
“I’d like to help them. I think we could get a brownfield designation for the old turkey processing plant near them, and that would help them expand or fix up that entrance,” said Postville Mayor Leigh Rekow. “But we can’t do anything until this lawsuit is resolved.”
Part of Postville
Agri Star came to be when Montreal businessman Hershey Friedman formed a limited liability corporation called SHF Industries and bought the assets of the bankrupt Agriprocessors plant in June 2009.
The sale came 13 months after a massive U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid on the plant, which ended in 389 arrests of workers on immigration violations.
Immediately after the raid in May 2008, replacement workers with little training were brought in to replace the undocumented workers who were detained and eventually deported. At the same time, the housing bubble had burst, and property values were plummeting in Postville.
Enter Friedman who bought the plant and promised to pay better wages, install an E-Verify system for background checks and run everything above board.
Friedman bought the assets “free and clear” of liability in 2009, according to court filings. He still operates the business as a kosher slaughterhouse, which means the animals must be killed and prepared in a specific way in accordance with the laws of the Torah.
Rekow said the replacement workers soon were replaced by permanent employees much to the relief of locals who became concerned with the rowdy happenings downtown when the shifts got out. Even though Friedman didn’t plan to live in town like the former owners, Rekow said, things seemed to be moving in the right direction.
Then, the county sued in 2010 saying that the company owed taxes for the 2007-2008 tax year when they went unpaid by Agri Star [sic – should read: “Agriprocessors”]. SHF pointed to the “free and clear” ruling, but in January of this year, the same judge that gave that ruling said that although Agri Star was aware of the tax liability, it chose not to make the court aware of it. Therefore, the company was “not a good faith purchaser” and the county still was owed the money.
But the court also said there was a question if it could rightly make SHF pay the back taxes or if the county needed to collect from some other entity, such as the banks that had sold the Agriprocessors assets.
In response to a request for an interview, Friedman issued a statement through the Des Moines public relations firm WPNT: “Our intent with Agri Star Meat and Poultry LLC is to create a high-quality product and a high-quality workplace. We are committed to the employees of Agri Star, the city of Postville and our customers across the country. We strive to create a safe, productive workplace where our employees are provided with competitive wages and benefits. We produce high-quality products for our kosher consumers. Two key components of our business strategy are integrity and trustworthiness. We will strive every day to uphold these values.”
‘Downward spiral’
Today, Postville looks much like it likely did before the 2008 raid. The town of 2,227 sits at the crossroads of highways 51, 52 and 18 in a hilly part of northeast Iowa.
Hispanics, many of whom work at Agri Star, make up about a third of the population, and that influence is seen in the restaurants and Supermercado downtown.
Orthodox Jews, who also work at the plant, influence the downtown landscape as well. There are two Jewish markets and Jews dressed in black suits and white shirts walk along the four or five streets that could be considered the downtown area.
City Clerk Darcy Radloff said the town “is still coming back” from the raid and the effects of the economic recession, and she credits Agri Star with some of that.
Aaron Anderson, 33, has lived in Postville most of his life and witnessed the raid and its aftermath. He knows people who work at the plant and thinks the town might be better off without it.
“It wouldn’t bother me at all if they left; I think they should,” he said.
No end
Agri Star’s workforce fluctuates with the season, but the best estimate is the company typically employs between 600 and 700 people on any given day. That’s a tremendous amount of local economic impact.
It makes the acrimonious lawsuit between the company and local officials all the more sensitive.
In March, Allamakee County Treasurer Lori Hesse joined state Rep. Bob Hager and county Supervisor Lennie Burke on a trip to Des Moines to tell the Iowa Economic Development Authority Board that they would not sign off on a local match for the tax abatements.
Hesse wouldn’t speak about the lawsuit on the advice of the county’s attorney, Wesley Huisinga of Cedar Rapids, but the county’s position is laid out in a March 23 letter from Huisinga to Economic Development Director Debi Durham, which was obtained through an open records request.
“Given the substantial tax obligations owed and SHF’s continued efforts to escape liability therefore, neither Allamakee County nor the city of Postville are in a position to support in any way, SHF’s request for tax abatement or other local financial contributions,” Huisinga wrote.
In a phone call, Huisinga said both sides have asked the court for clarification on how to proceed, but nothing has been forthcoming. The county also is seeking attorney fees and other costs associated with the litigation, which pushes the price tag to more than an estimated $850,000.
Gross, who represents SHF, said the county and the city have been obstinate.
Tina Hoffman, spokeswoman for the IEDA, said that IEDA rules don’t allow the state to offer the incentives in question without a local contribution, so the incentive offer to Agri Star has been put on “indefinite hold” until the lawsuit is resolved.
jack - there used to be lots of kosher poultry places in Sullivan county ny- near Otisville, come to think of it. They could install a revolving door on the prison. Families could live near their incarcerated loved ones.
Posted by: Office of the Chief Rabbi | June 24, 2012 at 06:03 AM
Therefore, the judge ruled, Friedman's company was “not a good faith purchaser” and the county still was owed the money.
And this is a surprize because.....?
Posted by: David | June 24, 2012 at 08:35 AM
How ironic is that I am reading this as I pass by Leah Rubashkin's house.
Posted by: Bench Kvetcher | June 24, 2012 at 08:38 AM
why are most jewish owned businesses committing fraud?
Posted by: shlomo yomtob | June 24, 2012 at 08:56 AM
@shlomo yomtob
They aren't.
In this instance - the issue is being litigated. The two sides disagree, round one went to the county.
I suspect after round two, the two sides will settle somewhere in the middle.
Posted by: Rebitzman | June 24, 2012 at 09:27 AM
Leigh Rekow is finally getting smart. A staunch Republican who had nothing but good things to say about Hershey Friedman when he rescued the town from a mountain of debt due to the settling pond built with Federal money by the town for Agriprocessors - now Agristar.
Hershey hasn't been in Postville for almost a year. His son-in-law who was supposed to be running the place hasn't been around for six months or more.
Look for them sell or close the place.
Posted by: state of disgust | June 24, 2012 at 09:28 AM
Great, because it isn't as though the citizens of Postville have been exposed to enough frum duplicity.
And we wonder where gentiles get the idea that Jews care only about money?
Posted by: Jeff | June 24, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Rubbishcan is the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted by: Yochanan Lavie | June 24, 2012 at 11:56 AM
FM: your ignorance is overwhelming; in the legal realm, not being a "good faith purchaser" does not equate to being "decipitive". Google the laws relating to Bona Fide Purchaser....
Posted by: The Dude | June 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM
FM: your ignorance is overwhelming; in the legal realm, not being a "good faith purchaser" does not equate to being "decipitive". Google the laws relating to Bona Fide Purchaser....
Posted by: The Dude | June 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM
What a moron you are.
The basis for being a "good faith" party to a transaction is HONESTY and following all applicable laws.
SHF lost that status when the judge was shown that SHF had been DISHONEST (withholding the fact hat Agriprocessors had the unpaid tax bill).
What halav yisrael Cracker Jack box did you get your legal diploma from?
Posted by: Shmarya | June 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM
Whatever happened in the New York courts with Sholom's father Aaron? He put up his house and shares of stock as collateral for a loan. I think the bankruptcy court ruled twice that he must turn everything over to a New York bank, although he said he sold the house to his wife and the stock to other family members. I remember the case because the judge quoted Dana Carvey as "Church Lady" on Saturday Night Live.
Posted by: Neighbor Girl | June 24, 2012 at 05:36 PM
Hershey Friedman and Dan Hirsch make the Rubashkins look like Boy Scouts.
That is all I have to say about that.
Posted by: TheTruthAsItIs | June 24, 2012 at 06:22 PM
Its plain and simple. Friedman bought the company “free and clear,” with court and goverment scrutiny. For the court(s) and the government agencies to wake up now and demand previous outstanding taxes is outrageus. They should never have approved of the sale. Friedman should sue the court(s) and govt agencies for their errors, not the other way around.
Friedman was welcomed as a savior. For him now to be held as some crook is unacceotable. He should very simply close up the plant and tell everone to go to x#$x where they belong.
If it was anyone other than an observant jew, this would never be allowed to stand.
Posted by: outsider | June 24, 2012 at 09:38 PM
Posted by: outsider | June 24, 2012 at 09:38 PM
The law doesn't work that way.
Friedman knew Agriprocessors owed the money, but he hid that fact from the court.
In your glatt kosher Cholev Yisroel world, this may be good business.
In the real world, it's a form of fraud.
That's why he lost his "good faith" designation.
And that's why he'll have to pay the bill.
Posted by: Shmarya | June 24, 2012 at 09:54 PM
This issue was the subject of several posts here a few years back. Two questions the newspaper article does not address is:
1. Did the trustee (Sarachek) inform the court that there were back taxes due?
2. Did the city and county actively monitor the status of the bankruptcy proceedings? I clearly remember seeing the names of several Iowa governmental entities on the list of unsecured creditors filed with the bankruptcy court.
Lastly, I'm confused about which judge of which court found that SHF was "not a good faith purchaser". I was under the impression a federal bankruptcy court judge approved the free and clear sale to SHF.
Posted by: FirstGenerationBavarianAmerican | June 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Lastly, I'm confused about which judge of which court found that SHF was "not a good faith purchaser". I was under the impression a federal bankruptcy court judge approved the free and clear sale to SHF.
Posted by: FirstGenerationBavarianAmerican | June 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM
The same judge who originally ruled SHF was a good faith purchaser – meaning a federal bankruptcy court judge.
Posted by: Shmarya | June 25, 2012 at 12:14 AM
Rosenberg, it doesn't matter what are the facts in any story, lawsuit, controversy, etc. that you write about.
Your heart, mind, and gut feelings are always with the Gentiles, the secular, and the Jew-haters.
You have a tremendous agenda that fuels all of your bitter, lonely life and work.
Posted by: Sweetie | June 25, 2012 at 10:50 AM
Posted by: Sweetie | June 25, 2012 at 10:50 AM
Clean up your collective act, then he won't have to do what he does.
Posted by: Jeff | June 25, 2012 at 11:39 AM
[Hershey hasn't been in Postville for almost a year. His son-in-law who was supposed to be running the place hasn't been around for six months or more.
Look for them sell or close the place.
-Posted by: state of disgust]
As I re-call, Hershey was very clear at the time of 'purchase'-that he WAS NOT interested in the meat industry A N D he WOULD NOT 'function' the place for much longer than he has.
Posted by: Agri-vated Angel | June 25, 2012 at 08:37 PM