Haredi Mag Publishes Porn Ad, Is Pulled From Sale
The haredi glossy magazine HaOlam HaCharedi has been pulled from store shelves and newsstands across Brooklyn after it published a porn ad – apparently by mistake. CAUTION: GRAPHIC AD FOLLOWS BELOW.
Hre's the graphic text that appeared on page 42 of this week's HaOlam HaCharedi:
A larger version of the pornographic text:
The majority of the page showing the picture with the text in context:
Here's another bit of pornographic text from page 43:
Here's a larger shot of page 43:
This letter was issued by the chief haredi rabbi of London, Rabbi Padwa, banning HaOlam HaCharedi and telling haredim to return the magazine to the point of purchase immediately and unread:





this reminds me of the hamodia "Blow Job" article...
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2011/10/hamodia-talks-blow-jobs-678.html
Posted by: blow job | February 03, 2012 at 02:08 PM
Porn ad? Sound more like some rogue typesetter. Is that hidden in the original pic? Can't tell by the images you provided.
Posted by: zibble | February 03, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Why not just throw it away? I guess the extra time it takes to schlep it back to point of origin provides more opportunity to cleanse oneself of the imagery. "Unread." Yeah, right.
Posted by: dh | February 03, 2012 at 02:21 PM
This is really funny.... I wonder if anyone
copied the phone number.
The rabbis will now stop reading all together
Posted by: phillip | February 03, 2012 at 02:22 PM
oy vey iz mir a shande a harpe, but its tam geneidim :)
Posted by: fortzenstein | February 03, 2012 at 02:25 PM
Why should hareidim be offended? Their lives are immersed in pornography already (lusting after children in the mikva, visits to the whores motzoie Shabbos, sneaking off to the casinos in Atlantic City etc etc etc etc etc etc).
Posted by: R. Wisler | February 03, 2012 at 02:35 PM
So where is this printed? Is it on the other side? Is it embedded in a photo somewhere? How did it get there? Was it originally on the wall that was photographed? I'm confoozed.
Posted by: Shoshi | February 03, 2012 at 02:40 PM
"I need you pussy on my face and my tongue in your ass"
_______
I think this is just a close up of some kvittel a rebbe was holding.
Posted by: netflix | February 03, 2012 at 03:01 PM
Interesting. The "censor-ees" prolong getting rid of it. But those of us here that have the gift of free thought have nothing but questions.
Posted by: dh | February 03, 2012 at 03:05 PM
It is usually a different kind of porn. Same thing.
Posted by: Flatbusher | February 03, 2012 at 03:26 PM
What a low class story. Almost childish. Not newsworthy, tells you nothing. However as they say, sex sells.
Posted by: Confused | February 03, 2012 at 03:41 PM
What are they meant to say when they return the magazine to the newstands?
"Excuse me, my Rebbe said I am not allowed to read this. Can I have my money back please?"
That also explains why they didn't adopt the obvious solution of throwing it in the trash - they wanted their MONEY back.
Posted by: David | February 03, 2012 at 03:51 PM
It's not haredi porn. No pics of little girls.
Posted by: Eli | February 03, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Both magazine porn and haredim tend to blur women's faces. Maybe they thought it was a perfectly normal ad if there was a woman's face that was covered or blurred. These aren't rocket scientists and some of them probably don't know what a naked woman even IS (or what that text means, because it's in English which some of them don't even read).
Posted by: Malka Gittel | February 03, 2012 at 04:01 PM
It's not haredi porn. No pics of little girls.
LOL Eli! :)
Posted by: Abracadabra | February 03, 2012 at 04:12 PM
heh, reminds me of this: http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2011/12/haredi-website-replaced-by-porn-345.html
i guess the lesson is don't lay your meat where you make your bread. to keep publishing kosher, they could've kept separate refrigerators.
Posted by: Proton Soup | February 03, 2012 at 04:32 PM
The Kitzur Shulchan Aruch prohibits kissing the vagina (בל תשקצו) , he says nothing though about licking ass, so I guess its OK
Posted by: Bassy the Haredi Slayer | February 03, 2012 at 05:44 PM
What's wrong with the ad? I don't see a woman's picture in it, looks kosher to me.
Posted by: NeverFrum | February 03, 2012 at 06:45 PM
I agree with NeverFrum - the magazine kept to its principles and did not allow any women to be shown in the ad. In fact, has anyone - at any point - seen on the Internet or elsewhere such a Haredi friendly ad for porn? It actually looks like it was reviewed by the editorial staff and cusotmized to fit with the magazine's standards.
Posted by: Maskil | February 04, 2012 at 01:31 AM
Posted by: Bassy the Haredi Slayer | February 03, 2012 at 05:44 PM
Not kissing; looking at. Kissing is fine.
and this is why women can't be rabbis...
Posted by: Maskil | February 04, 2012 at 01:35 AM
They asked for everyone to bring the magazine back to they can count how many came back and know how many people still kept a copy! Let's face it, only frummies would buy the magazine, so if X copies were not returned, then the rabbis know that X people have kept their illicit copies. The rabbis might then be able to justify searches of their homes, shuls and offices and ....
Posted by: Maskil | February 04, 2012 at 01:31 AM
That is too funny!
Posted by: Rochel | February 04, 2012 at 08:17 AM
Why should hareidim be offended? Their lives are immersed in pornography already (lusting after children in the mikva, visits to the whores motzoie Shabbos, sneaking off to the casinos in Atlantic City etc etc etc etc etc etc).
Posted by: R. Wisler | February 03, 2012 at 02:35 PM
Yes you ass-fuck. That's ALL that ALL haredim do.
Posted by: Gevezener Chusid | February 04, 2012 at 10:23 AM
It's in English. Not Yiddish. So no one is the wiser.
Posted by: Moshe in Israel | February 04, 2012 at 10:44 AM
there was once an aticle in mispaha about a old russian jew who used to do cartoons and became frum later in life. they showed some of his work and one of them had a cartoon of a women with her top exposed. it was quiet small but it was there.
Posted by: esther kohn | February 04, 2012 at 02:07 PM
dis is pornography??!!
bah...
Posted by: totally insane | February 04, 2012 at 02:57 PM
Why should hareidim be offended? Their lives are immersed in pornography already (lusting after children in the mikva, visits to the whores motzoie Shabbos, sneaking off to the casinos in Atlantic City etc etc etc etc etc etc).
Posted by: R. Wisler | February 03, 2012 at 02:35 PM
Excellent post!!
As for the ad, How many who saw it are going to ask their spouses for an explanatory demo?
Posted by: Bas Melech | February 04, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Religious Jewry is a fucking joke!
Posted by: zoobiemanyak | February 04, 2012 at 07:24 PM
Since all of us here are married with kids, we all can vouch that it's a perfectly normal thing to show such statements to your kids. That's why we don't understand the issue that haredim have with the porn. Who wouldn't allow their kids the pleasures of pussy and ass licking?!
Most normal Americans would vomit from seeing this in the magazines that their kids read. Except, of course, for the radical lefties, drug addicts, occupy wall st anarchists, failed messiah losers with failed lives, and liberal ideologues who insist on teaching others' kids about sex.
Posted by: nancy pelosi sucks obama | February 04, 2012 at 07:58 PM
You should lick the ass after you lick the vagina not to transfer bacteria.
My wife always complains that I kiss her lips after I kiss her ass.
I am sure that after the rabbis announcements people who otherwise missed the porn will start looking for it and maybe will try it if they never done it before.
Posted by: Yehuda | February 04, 2012 at 08:36 PM
The porn was not a mistake. The insertion was sabotage. It doesn't belong in a family magazine.
Posted by: Bas Melech | February 04, 2012 at 10:19 PM
hahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: esther | February 05, 2012 at 02:07 AM
I am Chardei. My wife is from a renowned Chassidic home. YEs she shaves her head and I have lange peiyes. But she shaves "everywhere" and still sits on my face. Just because we are Chassidishe doesn't mean we can't have as much fun as you shmekers in bed. We do and probably more!
Posted by: David Feiner | February 05, 2012 at 04:19 AM
Oy, what's next, ads for golden showers and fisting?
Posted by: BiF | February 05, 2012 at 05:23 AM
PHILISTINES!
THIS IS ART NOT PORN!
The photograph in Olam HaChareidim was of the installation by Williamsburg based Polish crochet artist Agata Oleksiak, (Olek) called 'Knitting is for Puss***' which was exhibited at the Christopher Henry Gallery in Nolita.
http://www.bust.com/blog/2011/05/11/polish-crochet-artist-warms-new-york.html
http://green-buzz.net/environment/the-amazing-crocheted-artworks-of-agata-olek/
She is currently exhibiting in London (only 4 miles from Rabbi Padwa!).
To view her installation see:-
http://agataolek.com/portfolio/installations_olek_01of27.html
If she ever exhibits in Israel, she will just love the Breslover Chassidim
Posted by: Barry | February 05, 2012 at 06:24 AM
"This letter was issued by the chief haredi rabbi of London, Rabbi Padwa, banning HaOlam HaCharedi and telling haredim to return the magazine to the point of purchase immediately and unread."
How do you unread it?
Posted by: Expatriate Owl | February 05, 2012 at 08:26 AM
and liberal ideologues who insist on teaching others' kids about sex.
Nancy, you're just afraid that your own kids could probably teach YOU a thing or two about sex! You're a prude. Get a grip. Kids are going to learn about sex from the street if you don't teach it to them in school, because goodness knows, and THEY know that YOU are not going to teach them any of what they want to know!
Posted by: Abracadabra | February 06, 2012 at 01:12 AM