Video: Skvere Rebbe's Attorney Lies About Role Of Rebbe In Skvere Community
Franklyn Snitow asserts taht the Skere Rebbe lacked the power to force anyone to follow his rules and says that Rebbe had no role in running Skvere institutions.
Originally published at 7:00 pm CDT Tuesday, 6-28-11.
If I remember correctly, Snitow has worked on Orthodox communal issues with Nathan Lewin, Sholom Rubashkin's lead appellate attorney.
Snitow has much of Lewin's style – which involves misrepresentation and lies that are laughable to anyone familiar with the function and history of hasidic communities and New Square:
Snitow monopolized the conversation. Is there a part 2? Anyone that knows anything about the chasidic reverence for their Grand Rabbi knows Snitow is pulling this stuff out of his rear end. It is absolutely not believable in the slightest.
Posted by: itchiemayer | June 28, 2011 at 07:13 PM
i LIKE WHAT THE GUY SAID LAG BOMER AND THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT
Posted by: seymour | June 28, 2011 at 07:46 PM
i DO AGREE THAT THE JEWLAND GUY IS A LITTLE OFF AND REALLY SHOULD NOT BE MENTIONED
Posted by: seymour | June 28, 2011 at 07:48 PM
Snito shame on you. Your lucky your father didn't become a skverer he gave you an education and your doing well for yourself. Why doesnt are you preventing your other jewish brother the same freedoms you have.
Posted by: SQ | June 28, 2011 at 07:50 PM
Jewland was not Sussman's name it was that nut at the conference.
Posted by: Loshonhora | June 28, 2011 at 07:51 PM
They're mostly nuts in New Square except for a few decent people like the plumber. Too much inbreeding. Many of them never went farther than Route 306.
Posted by: devorah | June 28, 2011 at 08:07 PM
Kudos to the Rebbe for hiring a kipa clad attorney.
Ultimatly this will be settled out of court, I highly doubt the Rebbe would stand on the dock rather than give up 18 million, but he will pay less than half, IMHO.
As for Rottenberg if he really has 6 acres if I were him I would ask the Mormons to make an offer their highest offer, & if I get no bid higher with in 6 months they get it.
They would love to infilterate NS, don't think they would let the zonning play with them, they have the will & money and are evil enough to go all the way up to the Supreme court, to build their church there.
If Rottenberg plays that card, they will have 6 months in which to give him full market value.
I am not Chas Veshalom saying he should sell it to the Mormons, what I am saying is that is the only way to determine full market value, and for him to get it.
On the other hand I think is not evil so he won't go that route,eventually some one will though.
If he did that,they would have a new card to play against him, I don't think he wants that.
The above is a theory.
Posted by: Loshonhora | June 28, 2011 at 08:16 PM
Rottenberg should sell the property to a gang of heroin and cocaine dealers from South America.
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | June 28, 2011 at 08:24 PM
And why did Spitzer wear a mask? Can Purim come out the same day as Lag Bomer?
Posted by: JS | June 28, 2011 at 08:34 PM
the whole town of new square is an outlaw town they would never exist if not for sec.8 food stamps and all the other goodies they suck out everything and dont give back anything can anyone tell me what they are good for?.
Posted by: jancsipista | June 28, 2011 at 08:47 PM
if some residents ,who are secretly against the rebbe but had been afraid to speak out, sense that the rebbe might be somewhat weakened and come forward to corroborate the rebbes absolute control, he may well be found civilly liable.
Posted by: ah-pee-chorus | June 28, 2011 at 08:52 PM
I love the way this guy has the chutzpa to say Twersky doesnt have complete control. Anyone even vaguely familiar with frum communities knows thats total BS. Does anyone else get pissed when they hear this guy talk?
Posted by: Aliza T. | June 28, 2011 at 09:24 PM
I think snitow should teach Bullshit 101 at law school
Posted by: Aliza T. | June 28, 2011 at 09:25 PM
Only in America (and Israel!) can a "religious" Jew (with a beard, with peyos, with a hat, with glatt kosher diet, an unquestioned leader of his "religious" community) remain silent while his congregants circulate documents demanding that another Jew be forced out of the community. Just like the Nazis did: "Juden raus!". Only in America can that "religious" leader say nothing when his congregants break the windows of that Jew's house and damage his car. Just like the Nazis did, smashing windows of Jewish shops on Kristallnacht. Only in America can that "religious" leader say nothing when his congregants dig a ditch that forces that Jew to take a roundabout path to get to the nursing home where he wishes to pray. Just like the Nazis did when they forbade Jews not merely from using public parks, but even from passing through them. Only in America can that "religious" leader remain silent for days when his congregant tries to burn that Jew - together with his family! - in his own house. Torching residences and barns and synagogues while Jews were in them was a favored Nazi tactic as well.
Twersky has acted like a Nazi, and that is what he is. If there is anything viler than a Jewish Nazi, I'd like to know what that might be.
And only in America can a Jewish Nazi be defended by "religious" Jews.
Posted by: MarkfromShortHills | June 28, 2011 at 09:26 PM
This battle may not have counted in the standings, but Sussman, at the very least, wins by a TKO.
Sussman does come across a bit arrogantly for sure, but Snitow comes across like a pompous ass. Anyhow, Sussman wouldn't be where he is today if he didn't have some ego.
Posted by: itchiemayer | June 28, 2011 at 09:38 PM
Mark - That is one of the saddest commentaries I have ever read...sad but probably true.
Posted by: itchiemayer | June 28, 2011 at 09:40 PM
Snitow represented HASC at the RCA Din Torah and lost
Posted by: Truth | June 28, 2011 at 09:44 PM
(Sorry for the run-on sentence that follows ....)
They're so enamored with their idiotic "shteitel" life and moronic backward "religion" (which has nothing to do with Torah) that they practiced back in Ukraine/Rumania and so unwilling to integrate themselves into the United States, send 'em back to whereever they spawned from in Ukraine. I guarantee that the good citizens of that land wouldn't put up with Twerski's crap for more than a day or two.
Posted by: Robert Wisler | June 28, 2011 at 09:48 PM
Snitow represented Crown Heights residents after the riots there twenty years ago this summer.
http://www.skhmlaw.com/Attorneys.shtml/2192019_1
Posted by: x | June 28, 2011 at 10:48 PM
the rebbe can't settle because then he will get 3 new lawsuits a year. if he goes to trial he will lose big.
case will be settled for undisclosed amount a few weeks before trial.
rottenberg will get $3 million but we will never know.
Posted by: Critical minyaN | June 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM
mr snitow dont forget to return the yarmika to the rabbi
Posted by: moshela | June 28, 2011 at 11:46 PM
I don't think Sussman can win this case. The Rebbe can always claim he did not know,all this was going on behind his back. Since the charge of proof is upon Sussman, I do not think he will succeed.
I suppose it would have been more promising to file a suit against the Waad members and people who threatened, one by one.
So it might be that the whole thing will cause a lot of negative media attention and the Rebbe does not like it, but I am definitely sure he will be aquitted.
Furthermore, Sussman gets heated in the debate. That's a bad sign for an attorney.
Posted by: soso | June 29, 2011 at 02:02 AM
...as long as Spitzer does not charge the rebbe and say that the Rebbe personally told him to do it, there is no chance for the lawsuit against the rebbe.
Because, ultimately, it amounts to "the Rebbe failed to protect Rottentberg", but the Rebbe had no responsibility (legally speaking) to protect him.
Even if the police, who have a legal duty to protect citizens, fail to do so, they are not really held liable. So kal we chomer the Rebbe who had no legal duty.
I think that the Rottenberg-camp, in this case, is mixing up "morally abject" and "criminal". It's not the same. What the Skwerer Rebbe allows to happen right next to his house might be reprehensible, but it is not criminal...
Posted by: soso | June 29, 2011 at 02:11 AM
"Snitow has much of Lewin's style – which involves misrepresentation and lies"
LOL, that is a requirement to be a lawyer!
It is your responsibility to do the best that you can and get away with to get your client off or you are not a good attorney IMHO.
It may sound cold but when you have a person who is placing their freedom in your hands it is your responsibility to do "whatever it takes" to do right by him. Sorry but that's the way it is.
Posted by: Leah | June 29, 2011 at 07:44 AM
soso what language are you using?
Posted by: Loshonhora | June 29, 2011 at 08:14 AM
At the end of the day Justice will prevail and the Unrebbi of New Square and the spinka will share a cell in otisville shortly.
Posted by: Moshe aron Kestenbaum, Williamsburg ODA | June 29, 2011 at 08:33 AM
Looks like Michelle Obama can run for NYS Senator, She will get 8,000 votes in exchange for the Rebbie's Pardon, so long as she walks on the right side of the street when she gets to New Sq.
Posted by: Truth | June 29, 2011 at 08:46 AM
LH - I think he's using the language of Rav Otto Korekt.
Posted by: No Light | June 29, 2011 at 08:54 AM
>I don't think Sussman can win this case. The Rebbe can always claim he did not know,all this was going on behind his back. Since the charge of proof is upon Sussman, I do not think he will succeed.
Sure, but the rebbe will have to go through withering interrogation on the stand. Is he up for that?
Posted by: Guest | June 29, 2011 at 09:16 AM
Snitow is always called in to defend chassidic outrages. Years back there were some children from Belgium who were kidnapped by their religiously fanatic father from their no-longer-observant mother and hidden by Hassidim in Monroe and Bedford Hills, and Snitow defended the kidnamppers.
(If my memory serves me right. I knew one of the Hassidim who was caring for the children and I remember him mentioning Snitow's name.)
Posted by: Gevezener Chusid | June 29, 2011 at 09:22 AM
I just viewed the videos. What I saw was unbelievable Chutzpah on the part of Snitow.
He must be drinking too much from his collection of single malt Scotchs.
It is unbelievable how he can speak such patently false statements with a straight face. And also to 'hog' (no pun intended) the air-time in a way that makes him come across as a bully.
Let's ask a basic question, when was the last time Snitow had anything to do with NS? It is amazing how he is SO knowledgeable of what goes on in NS.
It must be the 'enlightenment' that he received from Twersky (Read Twersky lightened money from his hand and weighed down Snitow's hand).
Posted by: Moshe in Israel | June 29, 2011 at 12:18 PM
SUSMAN IS A HOTHEAD CLOWN ON THIS INTERVIEW
Posted by: JICKY | June 29, 2011 at 06:00 PM
Why did the Rrebbe hire the top divorce attorney in NY for frum jews? Is the Rebbitzin pissed off - did she leave him?
Posted by: CALA NY | June 29, 2011 at 07:47 PM