« Agudath Israel of America Allegedly Pressuring Yeshivas And Camps To Hire Convicted Sex Offender Rabbi Yehuda Kolko | Main | Nathan Rothschild Pleads Guilty »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
----------------------
----------------------
FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.
Thank you for your generous support!
----------------------
Follow @Shmarya----------------------
----------------------
Please Scroll Down Toward The Bottom Of This Page For More Search Options, For A List Of Recent Posts, And For Comments Rules
----------------------
----------------------
FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website. Please click the Donate button now to contribute.
Thank you for your generous support!
-------------------------
2. Use only one name or alias and stick with that.
3. Do not use anyone else's name or alias.
4. Do not sockpuppet.
5. Try to argue using facts and logic.
6. Do not lie.
7. No name-calling, please.
8. Do not post entire articles or long article excerpts.
***Violation of these rules may lead to the violator's comments being edited or his future comments being banned.***----------------------
FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.
Thank you for your generous support!
----------------------
Follow @Shmarya----------------------
NY Times: A Muckraking Blogger Focuses On Jews
The Forward: "The indictments were first reported on the blog FailedMessiah."
The Forward: Blogger Focuses on Orthodox Foibles
Ha'aretz: Jewish Bloggers To Gather In Jerusalem
The Village Voice: The Fall Of The House Of Rubashkin
"PR Week: Shmarya Rosenberg of FailedMessiah.com did some sharp investigating…"
GAWKER: 5WPR Flacks Get So Freaking Busted Impersonating People Online
GAWKER: 5WPR Busted For Even More Blog Fraud; Uses Apology As Slimy Sales Pitch Opportunity
Jerusalem Post: Agriprocessors' PR company faces allegations of identity theft
The Forward: Flacks for Kosher Slaughterhouse Accused of Impersonating Company's Critics Online
The Forward: Flacks for Kosher Company Admit Impersonation
JTA: PR firm accused of impersonating rabbi
GAWKER: 5WPR Scares Holy Man With Sock Puppet, Blames Intern
JTA Traces Fake Rabbi Morris Allen Comment To Agriprocessors Spokesman's Home
JTA: Agriprocessors' PR firm accused of impersonating rabbi
Ha'aretz: Jewish blogger tackles perceived shortcomings of Orthodox Judaism
PR Week: 5W faces accusation for blog misconduct
GAWKER: Scheme To Blame Intern For PR Fraud Unravels
GAWKER: Sad Flacks Secretly Edit Their Boss's Own Wikipedia Page
NY Jewish Week: A P.R. Nightmare
Mpls StarTribune: PR firm's meat plant messages misleading
Iowa Independent: Misconduct by Agriprocessors' PR Firm Has Rabbi Considering Legal Options
The Forward: Public Relations Firm Criticized
PR Week: 5W, Orthodox Jewish group at odds over statement
The London Jewish Chronicle: "Shmarya Rosenberg muses on religious racism"
The Forward: "The indefatigable foe of ultra-Orthodox excess"
ASBURY PARK PRESS: Dwek Faces Shunning, If Not Death
New Vilna Review: Is There An Orthodox War Against Modern Orthodoxy?
Talkline Radio Network Interview: Rabbinic responses to Ethiopian Jewry.
Jewcy: Most Wanted: The Big, Bad Butchers and Bullies of Agriprocessors
What a disgrace.
If I was a woman, I would probably be more anti semetic than Shmarya is :).
Posted by: Q | June 30, 2011 at 06:32 PM
The grand culmination of two thousand years of Jewish intellectual pursuit. All I can say is- Wow.
Posted by: C-G | June 30, 2011 at 07:20 PM
Oh, but it has a rose, so it's sooooo feminine.
Posted by: Disgusted | June 30, 2011 at 07:29 PM
I think I will sell this on amazon
might outsell anything else i got for sale
Posted by: seymour | June 30, 2011 at 07:30 PM
i think this is one of the funniest things i've seen....pardon
Posted by: ruthie | June 30, 2011 at 07:34 PM
The grand culmination of two thousand years of Jewish intellectual pursuit. All I can say is- Wow.
Posted by: C-G | June 30, 2011 at 07:20 PM
they said Jews where smart
no quick
maybe they should have a kosher fact check machine
to see if they really are eligible for
food stamps
welfare
section 8
and all the other stuff.
the machine will be programed that after 20 No's
it will just say
go ahead cheat all you want they are just goyim
isn't that what you wanted to hear in the first place
Posted by: seymour | June 30, 2011 at 07:39 PM
Ruthie,
I know what you mean but this sick sexist misogynistic propoganda is hardly funny!
Posted by: Bugsy | June 30, 2011 at 07:40 PM
soon coming to a local store in your area. A SHEYTEL RULER. LOOKS LIKE A SHEYTEL HEAD EXCEPT THAT ITS GOT ALL SORTS OF MEASURMENTS AND GUIDES WRITTEN ALL OVER IT.
Posted by: deremes is sheker | June 30, 2011 at 07:57 PM
Posted by: deremes is sheker | June 30, 2011 at 07:57 PM
or mashgeiach of znuiz
A trained man will come to your house
and look you over check you wearing all type of cloth, stocking, wigs, underwear, nightgown, bathrobes etc. to make sure it meets all the requirements of your local rebbie.
Yes even in you own room and in the bathroom (there was a story on FM concerning that very issue) one must obey tnuiz rules ,
Posted by: seymour | June 30, 2011 at 08:16 PM
Dressing modestly is a good idea in many settings but a woman can really wear what she wants within reason.
Does such a ruler exist for men ?
Posted by: Adam Neira | June 30, 2011 at 08:55 PM
Shmarya, where is this from? Give us sources, man. You can't just stick a picture up and expect me to believe it's real (though I'd love to know it;s real - oh the jokes, the JOKES!)
So: SOURCES!! SOURCES !! SOURCES!!
Posted by: Illana B. | June 30, 2011 at 09:08 PM
Adam, it does but not for quite the same purpose ;-)
Posted by: skepticalyid | June 30, 2011 at 09:29 PM
I'm having flashbacks to public high school in the 60's. The dress code said that when kneeling, a girl's skirt should be no more than 2 inches above the floor. We left home following this rule. Then we rolled our skirts up or down at the waistband depending on whether the principal was checking skirts that day. Looking back at my high school photos I must say my father was right. I didn't have the legs for short skirts!
Posted by: neighbor girl | June 30, 2011 at 09:46 PM
Four inches below the knee? That could leave 4, 6, even 8 (or more, chas vshalom)inches of exposed naked female leg flesh for the bochurim to perv on.
Hardly tzniusdik IMHO.
Posted by: Office of the Chief Rabbi | June 30, 2011 at 09:51 PM
Why is this restricted only to Lakewood?
Posted by: Leah | June 30, 2011 at 09:57 PM
Sounds like stories my friends have told me about 13 years of catholic school - nuns measuring skirt hems.
Posted by: Bracha | June 30, 2011 at 10:34 PM
Why would any one bother with this ruler unless they wanted to play fast and loose with a conservative dress code?
Mid-calf skirts are extremely common. They are absolutely not a specialty item. You don't have to look hard to find one, and you don't need a ruler to buy one.
Posted by: EileenK | June 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM
A pink Rose and a ruler. Georgia o'keefe meets b&d. Reminds me of an old booty call.
Posted by: Critical minyan | June 30, 2011 at 11:15 PM
For fuck's sake.
Posted by: anuran | July 01, 2011 at 12:01 AM
The local Modern Orthodox school went through a period of elevating skirt checks to the level of fetish. Teachers - secular and Judaic, men and women - would stand guard at the classroom doors and inspect the girls. Sure, there were a few girls that always obviously pushed the limits, but most were "in the ballpark". It's amazing any of the students cared about being religious after such treatment. You can't make this stuff up.
Posted by: Neo-conservaguy | July 01, 2011 at 12:36 AM
I didn't understand how it works...
Posted by: soso | July 01, 2011 at 02:36 AM
The rose is naked. Not tznius. And a red one too. Isn't this colour prohibited by the Charedim as it inflames the passions?
Posted by: David | July 01, 2011 at 05:54 AM
soso
The ruler is an 8 inch carboard strip, as pictured above, and folds in the middle. On the back there's a magnet at each end, so that when you fold the ruler the magnets hit each other. You fold the ruler over the skirt and the magnets hold it up.
Posted by: Eli | July 01, 2011 at 07:36 AM
Illana B.
It's 100% legit - it's been selling for the last few months, $1 a piece. If you want more info (which store) email me: exaltedinsolitude at gmail
Posted by: Eli | July 01, 2011 at 07:42 AM
All three Roshei Yeshiva of BMG have to be able to insert there hand into the skirt of all Yddishe Mamas, to make sure that its not to tight.
Posted by: logic | July 01, 2011 at 07:53 AM
Frumma yidden have the leadership they deserve.
If they don't want to use this idiotic ruler, let some people with courage say no.
But the ruler is selling, right? Let the sheep have the rulers they deserve.
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 07:53 AM
Does such a ruler exist for men ?
Anthony Weiner would want one.
Posted by: Jewish Prince | July 01, 2011 at 08:22 AM
You need to h/t @dovbear for this one too. He posted it back in March. http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2011/03/tznius-ruler.html. Actually, someone else showed it to @dovbear on twitter. Who is left as an exercise.
Posted by: ysh | July 01, 2011 at 10:19 AM
Apologies to Rent:
COMPANY
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Six Hundred Inches
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Inches- My Guess
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Six Hundred Inches
How Do You Measure - Measure A Dress?
In Chumrot - In Centimeters
In Meters - In Mountain Dew
In Inches - In Miles
In Scripture - In Strife
In - Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Six Hundred Inches
How Do You Measure
A Dress For a Wife
How About Laws?
How About Laws?
How About Laws?
Measure In Law
Seasons Of Law
Seasons Of Law
SOLOIST #1
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Six Hundred Inches
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Tzinyus or pain
Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand
Six Hundred Inches
How Do You Measure The Clothes
Of A Maidel Or A Mensch?
SOLOIST #2
In Torah That he Learned
Or Gevalt That she Schreied
In Chometz He Burned
Or The Way That She Lied
ALL
It's Time Now - To Sing Out
Tho' The Chumrot Never End
Let's Exacerbate
Remember An Inch In The Ruler of Dress
Remember The Laws
Remember The Laws
Remember The Laws
Measure In Law
SOLOIST #1
Measure, Measure Your Life In Laws
Seasons Of Law...
Seasons Of Law
Posted by: Yochanan Lavie | July 01, 2011 at 10:50 AM
frankly I think that modestly dressed Hassidic and "ultra" orthodox women are a zillion times more attractive than the women and girls dressed like sluts roaming the streets who look like they forgot to put their clothes on.
If they have a tool (ok assholes, snicker at that one) that helps them measure their hemlines why the FUCK is it so GODDAMN important for you morons? (I'm using your vocabulary)
Posted by: Gevezener Chusid | July 01, 2011 at 11:28 AM
Why do you need to finger point Lakewood about this? I picked mine up in Flatbush!
Posted by: Frozen Chosen | July 01, 2011 at 12:13 PM
If they have a tool (ok assholes, snicker at that one) that helps them measure their hemlines why the FUCK is it so GODDAMN important for you morons? (I'm using your vocabulary)
Posted by: Gevezener Chusid | July 01, 2011 at 11:28 AM
1. Because they're an embarrassment. In fact, I'll use your vocabulary - they're a collective shander fer de goyim;
2. Because these Neanderthals, along with their evangelical and radical Muslim counterparts, are holding back the progress of civilization and making life far more difficult for the rest of us than it has to be at this point;
3. Because it's so goddamn easy!
Posted by: Jeff | July 01, 2011 at 12:20 PM
What's wrong with a good pair of eyeballs and some common sense to determine what's tzinyusdik or not? Why the demeaning ruler?
Posted by: Yochanan Lavie | July 01, 2011 at 12:34 PM
These people feel a need to make something quite ordinary, and worn by many people women who aren't from or Jewish for reasons of comfort and decorum special.
When I went to a chabad shcul, I often found that my "big skirt," which was closer to ankle length than mid-calf (I'm short and I don't sew) was longer and looser than the rebbitzen's. Of course, I often wore a red or flaming orange t-shirt or pullover (depending on the time of year). Talk about mixed signals.
Quite simply a longer, fuller skirt is easier to move in, to sit in, to squat in, to climb stools in. I also wore the skirts to work. One should never confuse piety with practicality or measure it by the length of a skirt.
Posted by: EileenK | July 01, 2011 at 01:22 PM
++One should never confuse piety with practicality++
Then why not wear a pair of properly fitted and fashionable slacks or a pants suit to work? Why is that so troubling for the holy rabbis?
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 04:00 PM
Sometimes I wonder if it's worth the bother of typing in the 'captcha' phrase...
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 04:01 PM
Eileen, when you dress in a sloppy, ill-fitting, un-fashionable schmatta skirt and gaudy T-shirt, you are achieving the opposite of tznius. I'll bet you wear sneakers with that ensemble, too.
Tznius is about not being a glaring train wreck of fashion failure. It's about looking graceful and appropriate for the occasion, without having to spend a lot, but showing like you care about the way you look, even if you're just going to the food market.
That is why, IMHO, a pair of properly fitted and fashionable slacks or a pants suit is more in keeping with the true meaning of tznius than the outfit you describe, notwithstanding what the holy rabbis say.
There are religious women where I work who dress as you describe, and they look ghastly. And there are religious women where I work who know how to dress, and they are admired and held in esteem by everyone who sees them.
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 05:46 PM
What would Mr. Blackwell have said?
He was Jewish, you know, and from Brooklyn.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Blackwell
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 05:48 PM
The rose is naked. Not tznius. And a red one too. Isn't this colour prohibited by the Charedim as it inflames the passions?
Even worse, it's a flower!!!!
Don't you realize what that means? Flowers are the turgid, swollen sex organs of plants thrusting out in all their lurid glory, sprinkling their male seed everywhere and drenching us in the crude mating scent of their vegetable lust.
And when you see bees going from flower to flower do you know what's going on? The plants are using dumb beasts to copulate with!!!
Flowers are complete pritzus. The rabbis have to ban them to protect morality.
Posted by: anuran | July 02, 2011 at 06:34 AM
I want one!!!
Posted by: Bklyn11230 | July 02, 2011 at 08:30 PM
Then why not wear a pair of properly fitted and fashionable slacks or a pants suit to work? Why is that so troubling for the holy rabbis?
Posted by: WoolSilkCotton | July 01, 2011 at 04:00 PM
WSC, I remember something I heard about 35 years ago, on a talk show on which the subject was whether or not it was acceptable for Christian women to wear pants (seriously). One woman - she might have been a nun - when told by evangelical seminary students (who, like our own yeshiva bocherim, think they have it all figured out) that the Bible forbids a woman to dress like a man, told them, "When the Bible was written, men wore dresses!"
Posted by: Jeff | July 03, 2011 at 05:30 AM
Even worse, it's a flower!!!!
Don't you realize what that means? Flowers are the turgid, swollen sex organs of plants thrusting out in all their lurid glory, sprinkling their male seed everywhere and drenching us in the crude mating scent of their vegetable lust.
Posted by: anuran | July 02, 2011 at 06:34 AM
If they understood that, there'd be a furious push to place male and female plants in separate fields and to erect mechitzas between them. Plants with both male and female reproductive organs are, of course, toevah.
Posted by: Jeff | July 03, 2011 at 05:35 AM
Shmarya is shitting us. This is a joke right?
Posted by: Bartley Kulp | July 03, 2011 at 09:03 AM
Rabbi promotes 'modesty wounds'
Girls should hurt their legs if parents won't let them wear long skirts, rabbi says
Posted by: Maskil | July 04, 2011 at 08:14 AM
does it work with trousers?
Also when are they bringing out the special shomer anayim eye wear for men? aka blindfold.
It;s a two in one as well, especially useful in summer months when the even at night it's light outside so u can also have tzniut relations with one's spouse. Can also be used for tzniut orgies.
Posted by: R | July 04, 2011 at 12:02 PM
Rabbi promotes 'modesty wounds'
What, no hat tip? I posted this over two hours before you made a post of it, and I'm pretty sure all comments go direcly to your e-mail...
Posted by: Maskil | July 04, 2011 at 12:38 PM
I don't know why this bothers people. It's hard for girls to see how a skirt looks in back when they bend down. My wife has that problem all the time. This looks pretty cool.
Posted by: David Z | September 30, 2014 at 01:31 PM