« Israel Independence Day In Williamsburg | Main | Israel Independence Day In Williamsburg, Part 2 »

May 09, 2011

Hasidic Newspaper Issues Statement On Photoshopping Of Iconic Image

Der Tzitung Hillary Clinton's pic removed 5-5-11 annotated They photoshopped Hillary out. They caught hell. Now here is their 'apology':

Der Tzitung Hillary Clinton's pic removed 5-5-11 annotated

Situation Room Osama Bin Laden Hit Hillary Clinton in picture 5-5-11

Notice the 'apology' in effect says our freedom of religion trumps telling the truth. And, for those of you who don't know, there is no Jewish law mandating the removal of normally clothed women from pictures like this:

The White House released a picture showing the President following “live” the events in the apprehension of Osama Bin Laden, last week Sunday. Also present in the Situation Room were various high-ranking government and military officials. Our photo editor realized the significance of this historic moment, and published the picture, but in his haste he did not read the “fine print” that accompanied the picture, forbidding any changes. We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department.

The allegations that religious Jews denigrate women or do not respect women in public office, is a malicious slander and libel. The current Secretary of State, the Honorable Hillary R. Clinton, was a Senator representing New York State with great distinction 8 years. She won overwhelming majorities in the Orthodox Jewish communities in her initial campaign in ‘00, and when she was re-elected in ‘06, because the religious community appreciated her unique capabilities and compassion to all communities. The Jewish religion does not allow for discrimination based on gender, race, etc.

We respect all government officials. We even have special prayers for the welfare of our Government and the government leaders, and there is no mention of gender in such prayers.

All Government employees are sworn into office, promising adherence to the Constitution, and our Constitution attests to our greatness as a nation that is a light beacon to the entire world. The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. That has precedence even to our cherished freedom of the press! In accord with our religious beliefs, we do not publish photos of women, which in no way relegates them to a lower status. Publishing a newspaper is a big responsibility, and our policies are guided by a Rabbinical Board. Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our intention. We apologize if this was seen as offensive.

We are proud Americans of the Jewish faith, and there is no conflict in that, and we will with the help of the Almighty continue as law-abiding citizens, in this great country of our’s, until the ultimate redemption.

[Hat Tip: Burich]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Separate from the issue of whether the editing of the photo is anti-women, the fact that a newspaper would manipulate a photo shows that they are indifferent to the truth. No respectable newspaper would do something like this. The fact that the frum community is largely indifferent to this is sad.

When was the last time anyone who reads that newspaper said the "special prayer for the government"? It's not even in the siddurim they use.

Does anyone know if this "apology" was offered in Yiddish and this is a translation or is this just the best English that Der Tzeitung could come up with?

Your "freedom of religion trumps telling the truth"? And you are the people of the 10 commandments?
No wonder you missed the Messiah! You can't even remember the ninth commandment!

they constantly steal phtoes from online news agencies and they always crop them. so u meaan to tell that thier editor always forgets to read the small copywrite print? all they did by. this so called apology is open up a huge can of worms

The Hassid gets completely aroused by seeing a picture of Hillary, and Bill looks for someone else?

Hassids should never sit next to women on planes.

Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women

Not allowed? By whom? Source please?

not sure what the hullabaloo is about-tis their paper, sold to a limited audience-why cant they do what they want?-if they woulda put in someone that wasnt there, that to me is lying-but if they want to take her face out, why should anyone give a crap, or have the right to criticize-no one seems to give a crap about how the media slants story after story to back up whichever political candidate gives them an orgasm, so why is this such a major problem?

please their statement is full of nonsense.

1. Did they have a disclaimer on the photo or in the article and say that Hilliary Clinton was part of the photo but because of Halacha (dubious) reason they edited her out. If they did that then maybe if not their excuse is BS.
2. I wonder how many of the readers and editors of that newspaper say a prayer for the US government and their officials
3. "The allegations that religious Jews denigrate women or do not respect women in public office, is a malicious slander and libel." Lets see a frum lady run for office and see what happens.
4. did not mention that they voted for her at 98% rate and then her husband pardoned some yiddin.
5 We do have a bracha about not being a woman.

Why don't they just say the truth and stick up for their believes and say it is based on the torah and stop lying

Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women

Not allowed? By whom? Source please?

Posted by: C-G | May 09, 2011 at 03:24 PM

that is a good question what I want to know is how do they walk in the street

Actually, they shouldn't be printing any photos depicting human beings of any gender, if they really are orthodox. That's what I learned in orthodox school. Betcha they sneak treif, too.

Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women

Not allowed? By whom? Source please?

Posted by: C-G | May 09, 2011 at 03:24 PM

that is a good question what I want to know is how do they walk in the street

Posted by: seymour | May 09, 2011 at 03:50 PM

but woman can look at picture of men

By whom? By their Rabbinical Board.

Please donate to Scott the Jew-Baiter (who gets by on welfare like the hundreds of thousands of Jews he impugns unless, of course, they are filthy rich like Oppenheimer.) as he is currently in the early productions stages of producing an insider's version of Jud Suss. FailedMessiah.com is just the working title. As a matter of approbation I have it on good authority that Goebbels chuckles in his grave when he hears the name Rosenberg and reports of his doings. I guess with all of the dust and ashes stuffing his ears he must marvel and is pleased to know that Alfred is still going strong and true.

A further falsehood is that they misrepresent themselves to the general community as "religious Jews" rather than the cult that they are. If they were truly religious they wouldn't look and behave as they do. These people are a disgrace and an embarrassment to Jews and all human beings, everywhere.

Actually, the original picture was also doctored. Here's the REAL picture that "they" are trying to keep from us!

http://twitpic.com/4vmn71

"Here is the Huffington Post mentioning Shmarya

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/09/hillary-clinton-der-tzitung-removed-situation-room_n_859254.html"


If you like seeing FM mentioned in the anglo press, donate a few bucks and support this blog!

To tooclose2detroit,

There are even journals and web sites that discuss how news is slanted by different news organizations and journaliasts.

As for calling Di Zeitung out re: lying to its readers by photoshopping the picture instead of just covering part of the picture with black electrical tape, its called freedom of the press. And saying something if you see an injustice being done.

It's still a lot more than I expected. Ordinarily, the frumma don't give a crap about others who criticize them, unless it involves frumma money or power.

They may very well have gotten a letter from the White House or other high-ranking government official about the picture having been altered, and so they had to respond. The fact that the letter is reasonably correct grammatically leads me to believe that they did feel the heat and had a lawyer write it.

They may very well have gotten a letter from the White House....

Good point, Wool.

++OMG | May 09, 2011 at 03:15 PM++

OMG, scroll down on your link and you will see a long list of major news sources all around the USA and the world with this story! It is also one of the lead stories on Yahoo News and the NY newspapers.

The frumma have made complete asses out of themselves, this time in front of the entire USA and the world.

There are now thousands of comments all over on every news website. Just look at a few, and you'll see how the world thinks of the 'orthodox'.

One of the news sites mentions that a CNN reporter showed the story and doctored photo to a senior White House staff member, who did not want to comment on it.

It seems from every article now appearing about this, and the comments, that the issue is not no much the aspect of this being revisionist news, but the insanity of not allowing pictures of women, in the name of 'modesty'.

Plenty of comments compare this to the Taliban and radical Islamic insanity.

Those of us here are accustomed to frumma psychosis, and so we aren't as shocked as we are amused by it.

There are now thousands of comments all over on every news website. Just look at a few, and you'll see how the world thinks of the 'orthodox'.

This is an enormous chillul Hashem, even by the low standards of the frumma. How can we correct this and make the world understand that this is not normative Judaism?

The problem is not Der Tzeitung, but the stupid constitution allowing freedom of the press, instead of much better system where every article and photo must be approved for publication by the rabbis.

David, too late. Now Yahoo News is carrying the story about the "kosher cell phones", complete with an unflattering photo:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110509/lf_nm_life/
us_israel_kosher_phones

The story brings up the matter of preventing frumma from texting members of the opposite sex, and looking at porn.

There are already about 100 comments, all mocking the frumma, and some mentioning jokingly that the phone deletes photos of women.

The frumma are finally getting the exposure they deserve.

ahh-everybody's gettin their skirt in a knot about nothin-this frikkin counrty is 14 trillion in debt, and this is the only horesehit thats important?-get a life-they didnt hurt anyone, they didnt steal from anyone, and its their frikkin paper for their readership.

wsc:
Be thankful that you not part of the frumma monkeys.

Those frumma are nothing but stinking up the planet.

The frumma are not even human they are from the jungle.

All the fruma can do,is having 12 kids and neglect them.

The frumma POS husbands with stinking long beards are sitting on stoops waiting for handouts.

I hope i helped you out a bit with your obsession.
And you call yourself and intelligent person?

Funny story,

a friend was in store in Williamsburg when a few chasideshe girl walk in complaining about the costume poster that blocked out the girl faces.

They6 where mad, why anybody would do that to them.

sadly a first lesson how they will be treated as adults ,

may guess is
that the daily show and colbert will have a field day with this

TooClose, they do indeed have the right to publish whatever silly drek they want, and although they did violate the warning about not altering the photo, I doubt if charges will be pursued against them.

Likewise, the rest of the world has the right to mock them for carrying their silly fanatical beliefs to such an extreme.

You and I are accustomed to frumma lunacy. This time, let the rest of the planet see it.

David, my conclusion is that the answer is not to give up Judaism, but to be the best ambassadors for Judaism we can all be ie. study the Torah and also have a regular job and strive to be on all-round decent friendly kind person, kind and friendly to all, not just fellow Jews.
We must not let the Haredim define Judaism for us, or be the face of Judaism to the rest of the world. The only way, IMHO, is to do BOTH Torah study and BE a regular person ie. a "mensch", and be friendly to non-Jews not out of fear of repercussions, but because all humans are "tzelem Elokim" not just Jews.

This story has gone viral. Little do they know this is SOP for all chareidi newspapers.

CNN just had the story on TV, showing both photos with a brief description of what the frumma did.

This is the kind of editorial action I'd expect from Wahabi extremists or Taliban.

MAZEL TOV SHMARYA!

Religious paper apologizes for erasing Clinton from iconic photo
By Jessica Ravitz, CNN

(CNN) – Faith has outweighed fact at Di Tzeitung, a Hasidic newspaper based in Brooklyn, New York.

The ultra-Orthodox Jewish publication ran a doctored copy of the iconic “Situation Room Photo” last Friday – you know, the one taken of President Barack Obama and his national security team during the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound.

Scrubbed from the picture: the two women in the room.

It’s as if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, with her hand clasped over her mouth, and Audrey Tomason, director of counterterrorism, weren’t there and weren’t part of history.

The newspaper later apologized for violating White House instructions against altering photos.

"We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department," the newspaper said in a statement Monday.


The original photo, taken by White House photographer Pete Souza, shows Clinton and Tomason.
The news of this broke Friday when Shmarya Rosenberg, 52, posted a quick piece on his blog Failed Messiah.

Rosenberg, of St. Paul, Minnesota, said he wasn't surprised by the photo doctoring and only posted something about it because "it was a slow news day."

A former ultra-Orthodox Jew, Rosenberg has been writing about the ultra-Orthodox community - mostly about crime and what he dubbed "strange media" - for seven years. He said the newspapers in that community have become "increasingly strange with their censorship of women's faces and women's bodies" over the past few years.

He said readers of the Yiddish-language paper used to see photos of rabbis with their wives and that there was then a time when the women were blurred. Now, they're just not there.

But in a written statement issued Monday afternoon by Di Tzeitung, the newspaper said that its decision to leave women out of photos is religiously mandated and that the right to do so is protected by the U.S. Constitution.

"The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. That has precedence even to our cherished freedom of the press," the statement said. "Publishing a newspaper is a big responsibility, and our policies are guided by a Rabbinical Board."

"Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging women, which is certainly never our intention," it continued. "We apologize if this was seen as offensive."

Within Judaism, there are a number of denominations - Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist and modern Orthodox, to name some - and ultra-Orthodox Judaism accounts for just one branch of the faith.

It's worth noting that the White House attached this disclaimer to the photo when it was released:

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

"We're not going to comment" on this matter, a White House senior official told CNN.

The leadership at Di Tzietung, though, apologized for violating the disclaimer.

"Our photo editor realized the significance of this historic moment, and published the picture, but in his haste he did not read the 'fine print' that accompanied the picture, forbidding any changes," the newspaper said in its Monday statement.

Furthermore, Di Tzeitung noted the Orthodox community's respect for Clinton, who served as a senator in New York for eight years.

"She won overwhelming majorities in the Orthodox Jewish communities...because the religious community appreciated her unique capabilities and compassion to all communities," the statement said. "The allegations that religious Jews denigrate women or do not respect women in public office is a malicious slander and libel."

Once again, my question is: why is it assur to print a picture of a modestly-dressed woman? Is it also assur to look at a woman, even when she's not dressed provocatively? Can someone here provide a source?

From the number outlets that carried scott's original article one can safely extrapolate the ridicule and opprobrium it must have generated. Now that it has gone viral I wonder how many lost parnossa or were treated shabbily or worse, G-d forbid, as a result of someone having read this article? In other words the harm is incalculable and that too will be on scott's head.

From the number outlets that carried scott's original article one can safely extrapolate the ridicule and opprobrium it must have generated. Now that it has gone viral I wonder how many lost parnossa or were treated shabbily or worse, G-d forbid, as a result of someone having read this article? In other words the harm is incalculable and that too will be on scott's head.

Posted by: alex | May 09, 2011 at 07:29 PM

no the harm is because the moron who air brushed out the woman

Dave:
I couldn't agree more.

This will not harm anyone. The free publicity will help the newspaper increase its readership.

Freedom of the press does not extend to misuse of copyrighted material for commercial purposes. The dimwits at Der Zeitung absolutely ignored the requirement that the photo be run unaltered.

Wonder if "Saturday Night Live" will do something with this...

I read that a few years ago a girl's school in Saudi Arabia was on fire and the firemen were slow to deal with it due to some stupid version of tzniyut that the Wahabis believe. The poor girls died. This is insanity. We have stop these Haredim from going over the edge. The only way is to be the best Jews we can be.

That does it! I've decided to cancel my subscription. Is it any wonder that charedim are called: "Anoshim m'meah acheret"?

Hey good news!
Maybe this will screw up Rubashkin's chances of getting a pardon [not that he had any kind of a chance]

Anyone notice how sexist those asserted "laws of modesty" are? They're practically all male centered, focusing on impact upon men of seeing pictures of women. Never mind that women might have their own ideas of "modesty" and "decency" (and, of course, who deserves to be in a picture).

steven colbert did a funny skit on this

Since when was Hillary Clinton immodest?

Some commenters already mentioned it in the initial posting, the situation room edit wasn't exactly a first: Laura Bush and even female Israeli ministers had been erased in pretty much the same way by other newspapers and magazines addressing an ultra-orthodox readership.

The internet will probably make this archaic and misogynic practice go away rather sooner than later.

They seem to hold beliefs as extreme as the taliban. Should we invade?

Amazing all you Hillary haters who never voted once or wrote one good thing about her! vs. the N.Y. orthodox jewish community who always supported her in votes and in their publications including the zeitung, are now trying to re arrange their musical chairs and to show the world that their real 'hate' (or self hate) to the orthodox is even greater than their hate of Hillary!

I dont understand the Reform community why they even consider themselves the spokesmen for the Jews. Even non-orthodox like Michael Savage and christians like Glenn Beck and many more say that the real jews are the black-hatted orthodox guys from Brooklyn who follow the Torah and the Shulchan Aruch. Without learning them you dont even know what it means to be a jew. Theres much more to it than going maybe once a year to synagogue (by car). All their ancestors abided by these laws and they think theyre smarter. JEWS Do Teshuvah!!

For all you jew-haters out there, consider Hugh Hefner your Rabbi. Hes jewish too. Thats where the Reform community leads to.

Re Jays post, -

The Haredi ARE fundamental extremists.
- there is no difference between them and any other Religious extremists, be they Wahabi or Taliban

Posted by: A true jew | May 10, 2011 at 02:29 PM

Your problem is that you fail to understand why people like Savage and Beck will claim the orthodoxy is the real Jewish religion, they are using your religious view as a political tool, to argue against liberalism which reform Jews tend to lean. In addition, if you want to depend on Savage and Beck decisions who are a Jew you are doing a disservice to every Jew. We do not need others to tell us who we are, definitely not a Mormon.

There seem to have been two responses to the European (Christian) oppression which has oppressed Jews for about 1500 years or so:
1) become super-frum
2) become uber-Reform and try to assmilate.
In today's societies neither is an option.
I have come to the conclusion (as an observer, also as a fellow Jew, though Sephardic) that many Jews of European origin are still somewhat traumatized by what the European Christians did to my Jewish brothers. For that I cannot forgive the Christians. (As well as trying to hijack our Tanach for their propoganda purposes, but that's another story).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.

Thank you for your generous support!

----------------------

----------------------

----------------------

Please Scroll Down Toward The Bottom Of This Page For More Search Options, For A List Of Recent Posts, And For Comments Rules

----------------------

Recent Posts

----------------------

Tip Jar

Gelt Is Good!

Tip Jar

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website. Please click the Donate button now to contribute.

Thank you for your generous support!

Tip Jar

Gelt Is Good!

Tip Jar

-------------------------

Comment Rules

  • 1. No anonymous comments.

    2. Use only one name or alias and stick with that.

    3. Do not use anyone else's name or alias.

    4. Do not sockpuppet.

    5. Try to argue using facts and logic.

    6. Do not lie.

    7. No name-calling, please.

    8. Do not post entire articles or long article excerpts.

    ***Violation of these rules may lead to the violator's comments being edited or his future comments being banned.***

Older Posts Complete Archives

Search FailedMessiah

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.

Thank you for your generous support!

----------------------

----------------------

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com in the Media

RSS Feed

Blog Widget by LinkWithin