Exclusive: Chabad Hasid Arrested For Sexual Abuse
The Crown Heights hasid was charged with Sexual Abuse in the 2nd Degree, Sexual Abuse in the 3rd Degree, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child.
I exclusively reported the arrest last Friday.
The man's name is Moshe Y. "Itzik" Vaisfiche. His next court appearance is May 4th in Brooklyn Criminal Court. His bail was set at $5,000.
Here's a post from CrownHeights.info announcing a Sholom Zachor at Vaisfiche's home in May 2009:
I just hope chabad does not do anything stupid.
Like they did and do for SMR
Posted by: seymour | May 02, 2011 at 11:37 AM
unreal every day another molester gets caught. what a fucked up community we live in
Posted by: www.TotalBluff.blogspot.com | May 02, 2011 at 11:42 AM
$5,000 bail. A really big vais fish. Sounds like a feud of some sort or a dubious accusation indeed.
Posted by: Disgusted | May 02, 2011 at 12:20 PM
It's positively SHOCKING! Such a thing from a God fearing Jew? Who could have imagined this goes on in the religious community? I had nooooo idea.
Well, it's May 2nd. Can we break a record this month for hasid sex crime arrests?
Posted by: Ali | May 02, 2011 at 12:44 PM
its only a misdemeanor its nothing just like you said on the fdny guy
Posted by: moshy | May 02, 2011 at 01:22 PM
I was waiting for an idiotic comment from some fool like Moshy. I know know one will believe me, but, the overwhelming and vast majority of Chabad Chasidim are disgusted an appalled by these allegations and do not tale them lightly.
Its idiots like Moshy that post online and make us all look like fools. Not to mention, Moshy you idiot, there isn't always enough evidence or cooperation from the victims to bring felony charges. It doesn't mean that a rape wasn't committed. Is vaginal rubbing by a 33 year man against a 13 year old girl not enough for you. Often that's the case. There is not "rape" or enough evidence but all kinds of sex could be going on. Only a penetration of a girl under 14 will disgust you. You sick pig. You speak for no one but yourself.
Posted by: ca | May 02, 2011 at 01:39 PM
Sorry 4 the typos.
Posted by: ca | May 02, 2011 at 01:40 PM
He is not a molested bachur raping an innocent female trying to prove to himself that he is heterosexual instead of homosexual. For that purpose he would have been better off going to a prostitute.
He is a married man with a son which makes his crime of commiting rape even more of a crime than if he would have been a bachur who had never previously had sex.
$5,000 bail is a joke. He should be required to post bail of at least a few million dollars if he should be let out on bail at all and a condition of his bail should be house arrest with an ankle braclet.
Even if he didn't forcibly rape her, he is guilty of statuatory rape. She is so young that he probably didn't have to force himself on her because of her lack of sex education. The chutzpa of a 33 year old man having sex with a 13 year old betula. Lock him up and throw away the key.
But that probably won't happen. He is pleading guilty to lesser charges and will probably get off with just probation and no jail time.
Posted by: Hakham Yosef Haim | May 02, 2011 at 02:14 PM
The fact that he got bail only $5000.00 which is really a joke, suggests that the felony was not that bad, maybe Moshy is right that it was only a misdemeanor. CA u sound personally touched did anyone ever molested u ??
Posted by: Yossi. | May 02, 2011 at 03:25 PM
5000 bail and misdemeanor charges means that there is something considered normal in goyshe circles (consensual relationship from 13 years old)
Posted by: chassid | May 02, 2011 at 03:25 PM
yossi
read it is posted from te court that are 3 misdemeanors
Posted by: chassid | May 02, 2011 at 03:39 PM
hmm... Something smells 'fishy' here. Only misdemeanor charges for rape? I thought this was a rapist who was 'released on a 100k bail'... So where is YOUR retraction, moron?
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 03:40 PM
sam
and he was not raped by a teacher
Posted by: chassid | May 02, 2011 at 03:43 PM
Mr. Minister Seymour....could you please tell me what stupidity did Chabad do by SMR ???
Posted by: Chanoch Shapiro | May 02, 2011 at 04:07 PM
unreal every day another molester gets caught. what a fucked up community we live in
Posted by: www.TotalBluff.blogspot.com | May 02, 2011 at 11:42 AM
What a f---ed up community we have lived in for the past 40 years, when NO molesters were arrested. And what a clean community this is turning into, thanks to brave souls like Nuchem Rosenberg. Let justice rain down upon their heads.
But don't get paranoid! Not every third guy in the street is a child molester. Only every 5th guy is.
Keep in mind that every molester has approx. 30 victims, and 20% of victims become molesters. Do your math, and you won't be satisfied until another molester is arrested every HOUR.
Posted by: Yoily Weiss | May 02, 2011 at 04:22 PM
And what a clean community this is turning into, thanks to brave souls like Nuchem Rosenberg. Let justice rain down upon their heads.
LOL. I meant let justice rain down on the molesters' heads, not the brave souls' heads.
Posted by: Yoily Weiss | May 02, 2011 at 04:24 PM
it may not have been a rape with a male genital which would incur felonious charges and a higher rate of bail, it is possible this was a digital rape (rape via finger penetration)
Posted by: Levi Huebner | May 02, 2011 at 04:37 PM
it is mind boggling how a person who is supposedly a ben torah can come to this despicable and unimaginable spot in his life is this what our torah disciplines us for this molester is beyond words, i cant for the life of me understand how any religious person on top of it all a supposedly learned and pious one degerate into a tottal animal this is too much .
Posted by: jancsipista | May 02, 2011 at 04:54 PM
thanks levi hubner for your vivid imaginatory descriptions
Posted by: Joseph W. | May 02, 2011 at 05:49 PM
um I am not a big fan of Levi hubener but I am 100% that its not him posting and Shmarya you should probably block suck posters also like I guessed when I saw this on friday it would be a Crown heighter who's name I don,t know and apparently nobody in the shull I attended this Shabbos knows him either because I didn't hear anything about this case except for on this site
Posted by: The Real Joe | May 02, 2011 at 05:58 PM
wheres this guy from?
Posted by: MM3 | May 02, 2011 at 06:19 PM
hmm... Something smells 'fishy' here. Only misdemeanor charges for rape? I thought this was a rapist who was 'released on a 100k bail'... So where is YOUR retraction, moron?
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 03:40 PM
You're the moron, sam.
And you're also a sick little man.
I was told the prosecution would ask for high bail, and the amount the victim's family wanted I'm told was 100k.
But if there wasn't any penetration, or if it was statutory rape with conditions, in Brooklyn with this DA and the with most judges there won't be much bail.
Posted by: Shmarya | May 02, 2011 at 06:25 PM
then why wasn't he charged with statutory rape? you did claim to have information on a rapist, did you not? where is your retraction? and, btw, no one cares what 'you were told', it only matters what you report and how it jives with the facts, which it clearly does not in this case.
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 06:51 PM
How does it feel to be as stupid as you are, Sam? As arrogant? So uncaring and insensitive to the alleged victim?
What type of parents gave birth and raised a scum like you?
Anyway, here is what Vaisfiche allegedly did:§130.55 Sexual abuse in the third degree.
A person is guilty of sexual abuse in the third degree when he or she subjects another person to sexual contact without the latter’s consent; except that in any prosecution under this section, it is an affirmative defense that (a) such other person’s lack of consent was due solely to incapacity to consent by reason of being less than seventeen years old, and (b) such other person was more than fourteen years old, and (c) the defendant was less than five years older than such other person.
Sexual abuse in the third degree is a class B misdemeanor.
§130.60 Sexual abuse in the second degree.
A person is guilty of sexual abuse in the second degree when he or she subjects another person to sexual contact and when such other person is:
Incapable of consent by reason of some factor other than being less than seventeen years old; or
Less than fourteen years old.
Sexual abuse in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.The girl was less than 14 years old when Vaisfiche abused her.
But that isn't a big deal according to sam.
Posted by: Shmarya | May 02, 2011 at 07:00 PM
inquiring minds want to know... did he penetrate her or just fondle her box?
Posted by: Crown Heights Youth Core | May 02, 2011 at 07:53 PM
It says in the heiliger toirah that such sexual acts are forbidden. Obviously , someone who would harm a child is NOT a religious person.
Posted by: Shimmy | May 02, 2011 at 08:01 PM
real joe which shul do you go to? do you daven in 770? do you wave a yellow flag?
Posted by: Yitz | May 02, 2011 at 08:05 PM
I am here to represent the Kingston Kings. We will defend the honor of Crown Heights.
Posted by: Kingston Kings | May 02, 2011 at 08:13 PM
kingston kings???? hahahaha - are you a gay biker gang???
Posted by: Yitz | May 02, 2011 at 08:15 PM
But that isn't a big deal according to sam.
Asshole, did I say it wasn't 'a big deal'? I said, and still say, that the information you claimed to posses yesterday about 'a rapist' was manifestly untrue. No amount of spin on your part will change that. While you don't know anything about my parents, we all know the ACTUAL crime family you hale from, scumbag.
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 08:41 PM
yitz all what u need to know about is I am the type of guy who would of heard of this story from sources other then FM if this man is a real chbabdnik resident of CH based on the name in the criminal charges I will assume he is recent arrival to CH and its unfair to make this a Chabad/CH issue there are sicko's in every culture and neighbored and its sad that the frum community has a hard time dealing with the issue but hopefully times are changing for the better
Posted by: The Real Joe | May 02, 2011 at 09:02 PM
real joe - you are NOT a born crown heightser. otherwise you would have heard of him. So shut the fuck up-
Posted by: Yitz | May 02, 2011 at 09:11 PM
Sam - shut the hell up- you are an asshole because you dont care about victims- you are obsessed with terminology- who cares what shmarya called it-
Posted by: Yitz | May 02, 2011 at 09:17 PM
I like when women in crown heights wear whore boots
Posted by: Coochie Coochie Coo | May 02, 2011 at 09:18 PM
'yitz', you are right. who cares if it's murder, rape, assault, battery or a slap in the face? we must not let mere 'terminology' get in the way of jihad against the 'fruma'. anyone who dares to question it must simply 'not care about the victim'. pathetic lobotomized cretin!
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 09:35 PM
I can tell what your parents must be like, sam, because I see what you are like.
They must be truly awful people.
Posted by: Shmarya | May 02, 2011 at 10:08 PM
Sam you subhuman- I am sorry hitler missed your family you whippersnapper.
you are just arguing with shmarya over petty nonsense...
He reported rape, you are arguing over petty terminology, you say improper touching.
either one is very bad for a child- no child deserves to be hurt
Sam , kiss my gaping fecal hole you rapscallion
Posted by: Yitz | May 02, 2011 at 10:18 PM
the kingston kings will defend the honor of crown heights
Posted by: Kingston Kings | May 02, 2011 at 10:22 PM
Yitz- shut up or the kingston kings will get you
Posted by: Kingston Kings | May 02, 2011 at 10:23 PM
I am sorry hitler missed your family
Way over the line.
Posted by: Shmarya | May 02, 2011 at 10:27 PM
I beg to differ, Scotty – "yitz's" line about Hitler is the only statement that truly expresses the sprit of this blog.
Posted by: sam | May 02, 2011 at 10:37 PM
I don't think so.
So lets hear more about your parents.
Posted by: Shmarya | May 02, 2011 at 10:42 PM
It says in the heiliger toirah that such sexual acts are forbidden. Obviously , someone who would harm a child is NOT a religious person.
Posted by: Shimmy
by that foolish logic since nobody is free from sin, there are NO religious people. and it is completely impossible for a religious person to commit any sin.
Posted by: ah-pee-chorus | May 02, 2011 at 10:56 PM
The only difference between now and 10-15 years ago is that victims are now no longer scared to speak out...
It's for this reason that more frum pedo's are being indicted...
In regards to sexual abuse of children your local synagogue is no different to the local Catholic Church...
Posted by: Aussie | May 03, 2011 at 12:43 AM
the real question, above all the hot-headedness of the accusers and the idiocy of the defenders is how the community council and other leadership figures in the community deal with this. if they condemn it and take steps to improve safety then I think it is the best any community can do given that one cannot prevent the existence of abusers, only minimize their opportunities, ... if this occurs then the community should not b villified, if not, then open season. but its just stupid to attack or to defend outside of this.
Posted by: the usual chaim | May 03, 2011 at 05:36 AM
You folks should come visit New Zealand: here we have legal brothels and parlours. It you want a schoolgirlish 18 year old, she's yours at many of the legal brothels around this fine country, where the selection of sheilas working beats any other country I've ever visited. Elliot Spitzer would love it!
Posted by: A E ANDERSON | Epsom, New Zealand | May 05, 2011 at 04:42 PM
Aussie:
I repeat a joke told here recently:
A rabbi and a priest were walking down the street. The priest sees an young boy, and says to the rabbi, "Let's fuck him." The rabbi turns and deadpans, "Outta what?"
Posted by: A E ANDERSON | Epsom, New Zealand | May 05, 2011 at 04:44 PM
This case is NOT about his niece, but someone he knew
Posted by: someone who knows | August 08, 2011 at 04:36 PM
To "Chasid" from May 2nd-----Are you serious? You really think it's nice to bring in the "goyishe" game? Where did you get the idea that relations are sanctioned with children at that age in "goyisha" circles? No Gentile person I know sanctions that, and I know many! I think you are avoiding the issue and not addressing OUR problem in OUR community.
Posted by: Shaya | August 09, 2011 at 07:37 AM
It's incredible when people feel the need to point out the "Chasid" like anyone runs around and say hey, look what the Catholic did; or look at that baptist... Jews are the only one truly singled out as the "Chasid", the "Jew" etc... If some one is accused of doing something, it is proper to say that "man" or that "women" etc... What? people think only jews have problems? Like the use of that "goy." Really? If there is something I've learned listening and quietly watching people as a recreational past time; is that new york is a religiously and racially biased place to be.
i don't know if he really did what he did; what I do know is that non-jews do anything to point out at our chasidic community looking for anything we say or do just to point a finger with animosity, period.
Wall of Shame, seriously. Why not point out all the people (jews and non-jews) that are infringing on our rights that are working in public office? Gun grabbing, coming into our shuls to beat up our members; lying to people saying you are subject to the whims of corrupt police (that enforce policy and not actual Law) and politicians (that take money from corrupt persons) that are no different than nazi Germany, and occupied Europe where my family just barely escaped?
You people need to get your act together, seriously.
Posted by: Sovereign of New York state (not State of New York) | April 21, 2013 at 05:59 PM
Sovereign of New York state (not State of New York –
All those meds your shrink wants you to take but you do not? You really need to take them. Now.
Posted by: Shmarya Rosenberg | April 21, 2013 at 06:19 PM