« Haredi Interior Minister Refused Fire Truck Donation From Christian-Jewish Interfaith Group, Trucks Could Have Controlled Carmel Brush Fire, Saved Lives | Main | Chabad Rabbi Busted For Smuggling Cocaine »

December 06, 2010

Must Watch: Haredi Couple Are Wigged Out On People's Court

Haredi couple wig Peoples Court A haredi couple accuses a laundry of washing a $3000 human hair wig and destroying it. What's the reason for the judge's surprise judgment?

Watch to find out:

 [Hat Tips: FrumSatire, Jack.]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

this is very entertaining. i think the judge was correct, but i sensed the plaintiffs were lying as soon as the cleaners brought the girl up to testify. had they been lying, they could have left her out of it and claimed they were the ones that spoke to the customers. the fact they were honest in allowing the judge to see that their girl didnt speak english so well and didnt know the word 'wig' shows me that they they had nothing to hide. so i believe the cleaners was told that they should wash it . anyway, the good guys won in the end and a kiddush hashem was had by all.

------------JUSTICE UBER ALLES----------------
Disgusting, dirty, filthy, scamming pair of Haredi pieces of vile shit.

For identifiable Jews to go on National TV with the intent to swindle thousands of dollars out of a hard working immigrant couple is disgusting beyond words.

The Orthodox Jewess con wore her bazaar bought shytel to Shul on Yom Kippur and Lashon Hara classes only to then try defraud decent citizens of their livelihood and reputation is unconscionable.


From Isaiah 1:
When ye come to appear before Me, who hath required this at your hand, to trample My courts? Bring no more vain oblations; it is an offering of abomination unto Me; new moon and sabbath, the holding of convocations--I cannot endure iniquity along with the solemn assembly. Your new moons and your appointed seasons My soul hateth; they are a burden unto Me; I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide Mine eyes from you; yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear; your hands are full of blood.
Wash you, make you clean, put away the evil of your doings from before Mine eyes, cease to do evil; Learn to do well; seek justice, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.

Isaiah was talking to religiously observant people, but who only knew one of the two Tablets of the Law. Sadly, history repeats itself.

While the following is a metaphor for the entire nation, on a literal level, it is sadly applicable:
From Isaiah 3:
In that day the Lord will take away the bravery of their anklets, and the fillets, and the crescents; the pendants, and the bracelets, and the veils; the headtires, and the armlets, and the sashes, and the corselets, and the amulets; the rings, and the nose-jewels; the aprons, and the mantelets, and the cloaks, and the girdles; and the gauze robes, and the fine linen, and the turbans, and the mantles. And it shall come to pass, that ... instead of curled hair baldness. (OK, the wig was straight, still)

What a Chilul Hashem, for a hope of 3K.
I guess someone needs a job, and may have no qualifications, the house ATMs & creditcard balance transfers have gone. Now what?

How do you know they are Charedi?

Secondly, I wouldn't take the People's Court too seriously. It's a tv show, could be entirely scripted and they could all be actors. Regardless, I don't like the negative attention Jews will get out of this.

Disturbing. Very disturbing. And a very wise and astute judge.

I felt physically ill watching that.

+++How do you know they are Charedi?+++

youre right. they were a typical reformed couple where the husband has a beard and a black kippah and the wife covers her hair with a $3000 wig.


++could be entirely scripted and they could all be actors. ++

these shows are real. i know people who were on one and it is legit.

wow i know the couple they were my neighbors i cant beleive they did such hillel hashem horrible if its true that they lied

lubavitchers are LIARS .
it's obvious in this case . mendy and hindy , how much can you ask for , as evidence ? the names speak for itself .

plus , they don't know that there is an easy way to find out. a label, a store, a receipt, a record of any kind..........,
and putting 2 and 2 together .

what nerve those 2 lubavitchers have to come before a judge , when they perfectly know that the wig that cost $ 3,000 is not the short wig , but the one this bitch is wearing .

$3,000 for a short wig does not make sense .

the judge found the evidence of fraud snappy.
JUST LIKE SHOLOM RUBASHKIN's CASE of financial fraud . black on white , with EVIDENCE OF RECORDS on records .

3,0000 for a wig ? damn it !

these 2 lubavitcher fraudsters should be ashamed to ask for money. if they can afford to pay $ 3,000 !!! for a piece
of crap, they they should buy another one ,
AND NOT ASK THOSE POOR SPANISH PEOPLE , WHO STRUGGLE TO MAKE A LIVING , for anything.

IT'S A SHAME !
i'm happy the judge threw them out .

these 2 lubavitchers must be filthy rich to
spend THOUSANDS for something that will last a short time.

they are beautiful wigs for $ 400 , $500 .
but they have so much money to throw out of the window, that $3,000 thousands do not make a difference . it looks like mendel has a business that works well.
he looks well fed, well dressed and well put together .

the spanish owners of the laundrymat SHOULD SUE THEM BACK for accusing them falsly . they have evidence of FRAUD based on what the judge found out .

the spanish owners can sue these 2 lubavitcher fraudsters and can get a nice
settlement .

morality,
if you see a lubavitcher coming up with a lawsuit , or accusing you of anything .
YOU SHOULD KNOW RIGHT AWAY THAT THEY ARE LYING . even before considering looking into the case .

lubavitchers are ALL LIARS .


I have on occasion run out of shampoo and used dish detergent. It left my hair shiny and soft.

How did they think they were going to get away with it? They're answers outside of the courtroom make them look guilty. They should reveal their last names.

I also don't believe that a two year old put the wig in the bag. They're too damn short!

Get rid of the wigs and hats. This is the 21st century...

Their answers...

lubavitchers are LIARS .
it's obvious in this case . mendy and hindy , how much can you ask for , as evidence ? the names speak for itself .

They're not Lubavitchers.

I feel like throwing up after watching this. Our families burned up in Europe how long ago? Now these shandas dare to do such things in 2010. I still feel like throwing up.

youre right. they were a typical reformed couple where the husband has a beard and a black kippah and the wife covers her hair with a $3000 wig.

Doesn't make them Charedi. Also, the man had a trimmed beard (also not indicative of anything on its own). But they could be MO.

these shows are real. i know people who were on one and it is legit.

I once heard the tv show would actually pay whatever damages were awarded by the "judge". I think a healthy dose of skepticism is necessary: no judgment can actually be enforced and I have a hard time believing both parties would be willing to go on the show if there was no benefit to them.

Never thought I'd say this but I actually miss harold.

i know them they are definitly not lubavichers i stll cant beleive that this is true i cant bring myself to beleive it on the other hand for money anything is possible they live in bp i knew the wifes father extreemly well and i spoke with the husband what can i say

nothing says yiddishkeit like a $3000 wig when hundreds of people who are literally starving could have been fed for less.

The show goes to the courthouse and searches the small claims cases filed and contacts the parties and asks if they want to appear on the show.

I forgot how much they offer but it use to be $3,000. If the plaintiff claims 2k in damages and the court awards that amount, he gets 2k and the remainder is split between the winner and loser, i.e., the plaintiff would win another $500 and the defense $500.

It seems very fair and equitable to me and why shouldn't both sides be compensated for appearing?

effie- i think youre right except they only get about $500 .

effie, As usual you provide us with great information. I admit a healthy addiction to these judge shows. Glad to find out how they work in part.

I am not surprised...No longer are the days of day trading, mortgages, real estate-or any other career choices for the shvitzers and hockers of boro park, flat bush, etc. as viable as they once were. These jobs are limited to the more legitimate workers -ones with degrees. He talks about his office and I am sure he ain't doing too well or else why try such a scam. Guy and his bitch are so f ing dumb to think they can outsmart the judge. What arrogance...but this is just the trend-why?-cuz the cleaners and judge and all others are goyim-hence, below them.

wow. did they really think they were going to pull a fast one on the judge?! That is horrible.

I got rid of my television years ago. I think they explain the rules at the end or the beginning of the show. I don't remember this judge's name, but I like her. She is Cuban and always makes pithy comments in Spanish.

Yep, I was wrong. Here are the rules:

"Both the plaintiff and the defendant have been paid from a fund for their appearance. The amount, if any, awarded in the case, is deducted from this fund, and the remainder is divided equally between both litigants. The amount of the fund is dependent on the size of the judgement." No information is given as to what relation the amount of the fund bears to the size of the judgment, nor the amount of the fund if a verdict for the defense is rendered. In a talk show appearance, Judge Wapner gave a few more specifics as to how compensation was typically calculated. In his words, if the plaintiff won, the show would pay his/her judgment and give the defendant $50 for his time, whereas if the defendant won, the parties would "split $500."

http://goo.gl/a1iZh

Lately, me understands why we American Jews wanted out of the ghetto mentality - but this time lets be educated and uphold tradition. Just because they gypsy-like Jews act this way - doesn't mean we should throw away our rich tradition - which these types of people don't truly represent.

Bring Harold back. Let's read his take on this.

firstly, the retarded couple isn't "haredi', moron. they are simply orthodox.

secondly, I am sure she stupid woman DID have an expensive sheitel ruined – the way she expresses herself makes is abundantly clear she doesn't have the brains to buy a more modest sheitel!

thirdly, the cleaners should have still had to pay the cost of the sheitel they ruined and the judge should have done a more thorough job investigating the cost of the ruined item.

I do not see any chillul hashem – Jews are allowed to have mentally challenged people too. G-d knows, there is a whole slew of them on this blog!

If you watched the video carefully you would note that the judge did get an estimated value for the wig and it was just a fe dollars. I seriously doubt that this couple is possessed of low IQ, just low morals.

1. The plaintiff, not the judge, has the duty to prove damages.

2. The judge was going to dismiss the case without prejudice in order for the plaintiffs to gather more evidence as to damages. However, the judge then realized that they were committing a fraud on the court.

3. According to the judge, and it sure looked like it to me, the destroyed wig was only worth a few bucks.

4. When they were caught red handed, they didn't really deny it. If I were telling the truth, I would have asked for more time to get my documents in order and I would be outraged that I was called a liar. They seemed to just slither away.

5. The woman and her husband are not mentally challenged -- just a couple of liars and thieves.

I think we've all been taken to the cleaners by the appearence of these two tactless buffoons who left a permanent stain on our public image.

Frumma think they can con anyone anytime.

A female Hispanic judge? They figured it would be a cakewalk.

And what's with the farkokta frumma accent they spoke with? Do they think THEY'RE so easy to understand?

Multiple this level of frumma crookedness in front of a judge by a million times, and you get Reb Sholom Mordecai Rubashkin in front of Judge Reade.

And like Reb Sholom, I am sure these scumbags are screaming "antisemitism" all the way home.

Chilul Hashem on national TV. Just great.

what a chilul hashem

I'm with Effie on this. Obviously these Orthodox (and I won't characterize them as being Haredi, or not) jerks thought that they could pull something off. Small potatoes, if you look up the case of the "pants judge" (not Jewish, by the way)in DC, you will see what this nonsense can escalate to.

I'd just love to have seen what Judge Judy would have done, when the woman said that "Jewish women cover their hair"!

sam= youre the real moron i know them they were my neighbors the husband has a shtreimel yes his beard is short but that doesnt mean they arent hareidi her father used to come over to us and talk for hours and you are dead wrong youre a real farrikte beast to write the way you do

Where is Rav Ovadiah Yosef when we need him?
You know what he says- wigs are chillul Hashem and a European custom, nothing to do with Judaism.
He's right about the 2nd part- the practice of married women wearing wigs dates back to the time in the Bad Old Country when Polish or Russian nobles demanded their "droit du seigneur" from poor Jewish (or Christian) new brides. If you
Google "droit du seigneur", you'll see that I'm right.

these shows are real. i know people who were on one and it is legit.

I saw someone from my yeshiva from about 20 years ago on a court show a couple of years back. He had contracted with some entertainers to perform at an outdoor venue. On the day of the event, it rained all day, and they were not afforded an indoor venue in which to conduct their performance.

"Mr. Gemara Kop" reasoned since they did not perform that day, he did not owe them any money.

The judge disagreed.

Dave,
That isone of the Chanukah stories tiboel lehegmon techilah.

LH, sorry I do not know what "tiboel lehegmon techilah" means.

The wife has been continuing her fight with the defendants' daughter in the YouTube comment area the past couple of days.

Hilarity prevails!

how did Heidi become Hindy? to the FM tribe, everything wromg must come from Chabad...

I'm going to throw a wrench into this - did anyone notice at the end, wen they walked out and were interviewed, that the frum woman said that the lady who owns the shop that sold her the wig is not in town, so she couldn't have answered the phone? Maybe the person who answered the phone, who was filling in, gave incorrect information? I was just wondering...

Rochel, maybe the frum woman was FOS?

I'm going to throw a wrench into this - did anyone notice at the end, wen they walked out and were interviewed, that the frum woman said that the lady who owns the shop that sold her the wig is not in town, so she couldn't have answered the phone? Maybe the person who answered the phone, who was filling in, gave incorrect information? I was just wondering...

The judge says the employee of the wig store said two things:

1. The woman bought a long haired wig.

2. The store doesn't sell the brand of wig the woman gave the judge.

The woman told the judge she owned only two wigs – the long haired one she was now wearing and a fall.

The judge also checked the price of the short haired wig the woman gave her and found out it was very inexpensive.

That means the wig the woman purchased at the wig store was the long haired wig she was wearing.

And it also means the woman and her husband were lying and trying to defraud the laundry and the court.

I have no idea whether the plaintiffs lied or not. But based on the clip, it appears that the judge acted inappropriately. The judge appeared to act like a prosecutor. And the plaintiffs didn't seem to have the opportunity to defend themselves.

since when frum people call their daughter heidi ? not real

Betzalel: I don't know about the judges on the planet you come from, but here on planet earth, judges get mad when you try to commit a fraud.

just wondering, that frum couple was as frum as frum can be. I don't think it is possible for any Gentile or non-frum Jew to acquire a frummy accent without years of practice, not even Frank Caliendo.

LH, sorry I do not know what "tiboel lehegmon techilah" means.

Posted by: Dave | December 06, 2010 at 08:30 PM

There was a decree that any virgin who got married had to have virginity taken by the Hegmon, first B4 her husband.
Hegmon is also used in English a Hegmony.I think it is not exactly a king, but a sort of local rep, like a Govener General.

Hegemony (Greek: ἡγεμονία hēgemonía, English: [UK] /hɨˈɡɛməni/, [US]: pronounced /hɨˈdʒɛməni/; "leadership" or "hegemon" for "leader") [1] is the political, economic, ideological or cultural power exerted by a dominant group over other groups, regardless of the explicit consent of the latter. While initially referring to the political dominance of certain ancient Greek city-states over their neighbors, the term has come to be used in a variety of other contexts, in particular Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony. The term is often mistakenly used to suggest brute power or dominance, when it is better defined as emphasizing how control is achieved through consensus not force.[citation needed.
Wikipedia, not Wiki leaks

jancsipista,
this couple were your neighbors .
where? brooklyn? which neighborhood?

If this case had gone through normal state courts (not the private "People's Court"), I wonder what the judge would have done when the perjury was discovered?

Also, the People's Court judge should have made the frumma pay $3,000 compensation to the laundry couple.

Loshon H. thanks for the explanation.
Here's a joke:
What do they call Wiki leaks in India?
A: Well they have two names for it: Vikileaks,
or Vikramleaks.

since when frum people call their daughter heidi ? not real

Posted by: just wondering | December 06, 2010 at 09:37 PM

My English name is Heidi I really hate it and I know a few other Jewish people by that name but they are middle aged.

Did she really grab his weiner at about 42 seconds into the video?

dan, i know what you meant .why did she take her left hand under the table for
just 1 second? what under the table ? nothing . bad move . another hillul hashem . a pretty quick , this one .

read the comments by frum people here:
www.crownheights.info/index.php?itemid=30538#c

>. The judge appeared to act like a prosecutor. And the plaintiffs didn't seem to have the opportunity to defend themselves.

Um... this type of proceeding is modeled on small claims court, and *not* on criminal court. The judge is allowed to ask questions, etc.

I predict this video will be an international hit and go viral.

It is an antisemite's dream come true.

This is why it is so important that the frumma really do answer to a higher standard and this is what people like Harold could never quite understand.

chaim yes they were my neighbors in brooklyn they moved a couple of years ago to another part of brooklyn you dont think i will write it down to you here do you where they moved?

nausiating cruddy creeps. they should be arrested for fraud and institutionalized for moronity.
(btw...great how she managed to interject her social commentary. three thousand dollar wigs are 'mid range,' for us machmir wig wearers.)
great judge. great job. (her comment about how mendy was so irresistible etc. shouldta passed though.)

what scares is how they manage to project sincerity and honesty. i used to think i was a good judge of character, but i find that with these self rightous swindlers i can't tell.

To everyone who believes what they saw - the whole thing is a TV show, not a real court. It is edited too.

In any real court of justice, a judge does not call people liars without allowing them the chance to respond.

Yes, frum people do bad things. However, in this case, I doubt it. Do you really think that lady had two wigs, one worth $3,000 and the other a few dollars? And how could the judge determine that the wig was not a long haired wig just by looking at it? The wig was obviously destroyed. And what about the tag? Who knows what the tag said? The judge doesn't know anything about wigs. And who did the judge talk to anyway? We don't know. That person never testified in court.

These folks were prepared to go into a REAL court and swear to this under oath. Amazing. Too bad they only get embarassed to death.

Betzalel, yes, that's exactly what happened. The wig which looked like crap probably cost $10, and this frumbag bitch claimed it was worth $3,000.

The bitch claimed she bought it from a store and paid $3,000 for it. The TV judge called the store and the store said they didn't stock the brand. The bitch lied. End of story, EXCEPT--

Frumbags such as yourself have the audicity to defend this bitch because she's a fellow frumbag. I'll bet if she were a secular Jew you'd be calling for her scalp.

this clip looks like a T.V show.
it does not look real.
are those actors?

Mr. Apikorsis,

Human hair wigs cost thousands of dollars, not $10. It is possible to determine if a wig is human hair just by examining it. It's finer than animal hair. You don't have to check the tag. The judge never disputed that it was human hair, as the plaintiffs said it was. I doubt the plaintiffs would have made such a claim that it was human hair if it wasn't.

As I said, the judge's ruling is questionable. Too bad it makes Jews look bad anyway. But of course, we've been accused of worse.

"is this a human hair wig?" "of course." ich.

"all parties, please raise your right hand." they don't. "all parties have been 'affirmed' your honor."

they have asked that the court not use their last names. the judge will respect that, but we don't have to. who are these creeps? publicize their names, where they live, and everything else about them. let's see what other scandals they have been involved in.

eric: This show has been on television for decades. Where have you been?

It's a television show where a real retired judge with a real retired bailiff mediate real small claims cases. The parties have agreed to the mediation and the retired judge's decision is binding.

Betzalel: The plaintiffs submitted a false receipt for damages. The judge verified that the receipt was for the wig she had on her head - not the damaged wig. The store told the judge that they do not carry the brand of the wig that was damaged. There is nothing questionable about the judge's ruling.

The judge is acting as a jury. Jurors are instructed: "If you decide that a witness deliberately lied about something significant in this case, you should consider not believing anything that witness says." They lied about something significat.

I can see it: A Charedi reality show!
Just like Jersey Shore but in the confines of New Square. Mom pregnant with number 14 and bitching as dad makes sexual advances on his 12 year old daughter; sitting around the kitchen table filling out a massive pile of fraudulent public assistance forms, the matzoh factory in the old school bus next door catching fire
The possibilities are endless....

This just makes me sick to my stomach. no wonder all these kids are going off the Derech. I am nauseated at the way supposedly religious people behave.

Effie,

I'm not saying that the judge's ruling that the plaintiff's needed proof that the wig that was damaged was $3,000. Clearly, the plaintiff's didn't have any proof, given that the judge verified that the store didn't sell that brand of wig.

I am saying that accusing the plaintiffs of lying in court without hearing their response is not the act of a responsible judge. There are two sides to every story.

I'll say that I was wrong before when I said that human hair wigs cost thousands of dollars. I see on the internet that there are quite a few for only hundreds of dollars.

Anyway, this whole clip is disturbing.

I don't know if anyone has mentioned it but one needs to understand how these "TV Judge" shows work.

Each show has young assistant producers go over to various small claims courts and go through the filings. They find cases which might be interesting and then the producer writes both parties and offers them a deal-

Dismiss your matter in the state ocurt and the show will put up a pool-let's say $3,000. The plaintiff if he or she wins gets paid out of the pool and the "change" is split evenly. If the defendant wins the pot is split evenly. Thus I'm guessing that Mr. and Ms. Frum actually got a nice chunk of change for losing the case!

I am glad People's Court aired this episode. It accurately portrayed two fummies triyign to exploit gentiles. Yet another reason for all mainstream Jews to demand their federatiosn stop funding schools which produce more of these parasites.

Betzalel: The judge asked:

Where did you buy this damaged wig? Georgi.
How much did it cost? 3k.
What's this receipt for? The purchase of the wig that was damaged.

Lie. Lie. Lie.

The judge never called them liars. She did say that they were trying to pass off the receipt for the wig she was wearing as the receipt for the damaged wig. The plaintiffs proved themselves to be liars. There was nothing to explain.

And as you will note, when they walked out and had an opportunity to explain, they did not.

Apparantly it isn't just the Spinka, Balkany, Rubashkin & Madoff. Now we get to see the g'naiva at the lower echelons of frum society as well. Why worry about the Moshiach coming? Why worry about the Torah? Why worry about a chilul HaShem to stir the anti-Semitic pot a bit more? From the petty ripoffs to the grand ripoffs we lead! Then we all sit around and kvetch about the goyim. Ecchh! HaShem Yirachem.

On YouTube this already has over 22,000 views and over 300 comments.

Great.

YouTube link at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc9Ef0OYOwA

All comments at:
http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments=1&v=Oc9Ef0OYOwA

Actually, the judge did say that it was a Revlon wig and was only worth "a few dollars"

So she did her due diligence.

At any rate there was perjury and attempted fraud.

Looks like the "Monsey-type Hungarian Chasidic-lite" couple - the wife is a non-tznius (by Haredi rules)loud mouth cheat-in-a-heartbeat ...itch who must make her husband miserable - she finally had her lunch handed to her. sickening

There was no perjury; this is a TV court, not a real one.

But this frumbaggress lied her ass off, and from what I can tell, it's a fat ass.

People must know them. It would be hearwarming if the local shul folks ran this dreck out of their midst

I know that people here have posted how this show gets guests, or at least how they did in the past. But I wonder if this whole thing is a sendup. Especially since the show's website has a 'contact us' page that invites people to contact them about their case.

These TV court shows were always entertainment shows, anyway. Back in the day when even former NYC mayor Ed Koch was a TV judge, they played it straight. Nowadays, you have clapping and laughter by the studio audience. Even if the Jewish couple filed a lawsuit against the washing service, there was nothing to stop the show from hiking the damage amount and inserting the Perry Mason-style courtroom drama.

OTOH, if the Jewish couple really tried to scam the washing service, I don't think many TV viewers in the heartland will ascribe this behavior to all Jews. These shows have all had people from all races, colors, and creeds come on and claim bogus damages.

If some producer did not recruit the parties to appear on the TV show, remember that Georgie's is a real business in Brooklyn and the TV show is produced in Manhattan. Georgie's got a plug on a national TV show. The hispanic family got a fee for appearing. Maybe a bunch of co-conspirators wanted to make some fun TV segments that would generate a viral video.

I finally found a commenter that agrees with me on youtube from succmgnt:

"The judge is wrong.

First of all, she didn't give them a chance to respond. A judge can't make a decision based on an accusation that the other side didn't have an opportunity to address.

Second, a judge is not allowed to consider testimony given over the phone. What if the person at Georgi's was mistaken? Maybe she didn't understand the judge. Maybe she's new. Maybe she's just plain stupid. This is why testimony can only be given in person when the other side is there to question the witness."

Call me a fool. I may in fact be a fool, but if so, this fool doesn't believe everything he sees on TV. There are always two sides to every story. We didn't get to hear their side.

This is a fascinating case, one that I will probably use in my Jewish Legal Ethics class because of the various issues it raises.

This would also be a good illustration for a teen Sunday school class learning about how to determine whether someone is lying or not.

Now, wouldn't it be interesting to see how a real Beit Din would have decided in such a case?

I doubt they would have ruled any differently. The PC judge did a good job, and I am glad she did not make her decision but pondered the evidence.

Betzalel, if the cleaners were frumma, and the couple with the damaged wig were Hispanics, you would say the judge is a genius. Please, Betzalel, be careful not to hurt yourself from bending over so far backwards.


BTW, this isn't the first time that frumma tried to bullshit Judge Marilyn Milian on The People's Court (it's in 2 parts):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLzz6Wx4MYQ&
feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDD5H6ZG6V0&NR=1

WoolSilkCotton said "Betzalel, if the cleaners were frumma, and the couple with the damaged wig were Hispanics, you would say the judge is a genius. Please, Betzalel, be careful not to hurt yourself from bending over so far backwards."

You don't know me, so I don't see how you can come to this conclusion, just as I don't see how anyone can come to the conclusion that the couple lied without hearing their side of the story first.

Their are two different Georgie wigs, They bought is from the former owner of Georgie ( who still calls her company Georgie) ...The company is now oned by her Husband who kept the name..the judge called the wrong store

You're just splitting hairs. EIther that or you've been conditioned to think that way

Their are two different Georgie wigs, They bought is from the former owner of Georgie ( who still calls her company Georgie) ...The company is now oned by her Husband who kept the name..the judge called the wrong store

Posted by: Wigs | December 07, 2010 at 08:54 PM

Wouldn't the judge have called the store whose phone number is on the receipt?

Georgie's Wigs:

http://www.georgiewigs.com/

I found something even more offensive than a frummie in the flesh; the Sarah Palin wig!

Did you notice how the Jewish con artist told the judge that married Jewish women must cover their hair? She made it sound as if it's an undeniable fact that all married Jews cover their hair. I'm not swimming in a cesspool with that freak!

why am i seeing georgi human-hair wigs here for about $400 ?

http://www.thewigemporium.com/georgiehumanhairwigs

These folks were prepared to go into a REAL court and swear to this under oath. Amazing. Too bad they only get embarassed to death.

Posted by: Office of the Chief Rabbi | December 07, 2010 at 07:58 AM

Were they embarrassed? I'm not sure. I don't think they even care.

Frumma crooks are not capable of feeling embarrassed. They only feel surprised and angry that they didn't get away with their crooked scheme. It's all part of their sociopathy.
Do you think any Rubashkin is capable of feeling embarrassed?

Betzalel, the frumma did indeed tell 'their side' of the story, and the judge gave them a chance to explain the lie. So did the interviewer when they walked out to the lobby. Maybe you need to listen to the program again.

Marilyn Milian was a real judge for many years. Just google her name. Do you think you know more about judging and the law than she does?

Look at the frumma liars on the other People's Court video- they don't seem the least bit embarrassed, either:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLzz6Wx4MYQ&
feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDD5H6ZG6V0&NR=1

Would someone please do a public service and out these fat slobs?! I would like to send them a personal note of thanks for pulling me down with them into their sewer.

Frankly, even if their claim was legit, it still takes the most vainest arrogant people to bring these type of suit to national TV. A person who is vain enough to purchase a $3000 wig sues a poor immigrant family for washing a wig that they themselves accidentaly put in the bag. At least be discreet enough to sue in regular small claims court out of the eyes of the whole nation.

What a bunch of low-life pigs.

My guess is that they will be in the news again one day soon. And it wont be pretty.

ALI: married jewish women do have to cover their hair, stop getting offended by the truth.

ALI: married jewish women do have to cover their hair, stop getting offended by the truth.

Posted by: L I L | December 08, 2010 at 09:18 AM

Then half of all the wives of Lithuanian rosh yeshivas pre-WW2 broke halakha, because they did not cover their hair.

And the same would be true for most of the wives of YU rabbis until the late 1980s.

You see, L I L, you don't know halakha very well.

Process that.

Shmarya: First off don't go bringing proof from YU Rabbis, your just bolstering my point. And half of pre war Rabbi's in Lita? Please, I've heard of select cases, but the fact that they broke Halacha requirements doesn't lessen the the requirement for women now a days.

Shmarya: First off don't go bringing proof from YU Rabbis, your just bolstering my point. And half of pre war Rabbi's in Lita? Please, I've heard of select cases, but the fact that they broke Halacha requirements doesn't lessen the the requirement for women now a days.

Posted by: L I L | December 08, 2010 at 10:29 AM

They did NOT "break halakha."

As I stated above, YOU do NOT know halakha very well. That's the problem.

why whats the halKha?

If the married non-Jewish women of your town / country do not cover their hair, a married Jewish woman does not need to cover her hair, either.

Rabbi JB Soloveichik modified that by adding that this rule applied as long as the woman's hair was kept relatively short.

Where is this halaka stated?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.

Thank you for your generous support!

----------------------

----------------------

----------------------

Please Scroll Down Toward The Bottom Of This Page For More Search Options, For A List Of Recent Posts, And For Comments Rules

----------------------

----------------------

Recent Posts

----------------------

Tip Jar

Gelt Is Good!

Tip Jar

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website. Please click the Donate button now to contribute.

Thank you for your generous support!

Tip Jar

Gelt Is Good!

Tip Jar

-------------------------

Comment Rules

  • 1. No anonymous comments.

    2. Use only one name or alias and stick with that.

    3. Do not use anyone else's name or alias.

    4. Do not sockpuppet.

    5. Try to argue using facts and logic.

    6. Do not lie.

    7. No name-calling, please.

    8. Do not post entire articles or long article excerpts.

    ***Violation of these rules may lead to the violator's comments being edited or his future comments being banned.***

Older Posts Complete Archives

Search FailedMessiah

Lijit Search

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com is a reader supported website.

Thank you for your generous support!

----------------------

----------------------

----------------------

FailedMessiah.com in the Media

RSS Feed

Blog Widget by LinkWithin