Gambler Who Lost More Than $1 Million Put His Trust In A Rabbi

A young professional poker player who was said to have lost £700,000 at cards put his trust in a rabbi to recoup his losses in bizarre betting scheme.

Gambler who lost £700k 'put trust in rabbi'
Peterborough Today

A young professional poker player from Hertfordshire who was said to have lost £700,000 at cards put his trust in a rabbi, a High Court judge has been told.

The rabbi, Simon Nissim, offered to place spread bets for Andrew Feldman on the Dow Jones index and give him any winnings.

But Mr Feldman, 22, who agreed to cover any losses and ended up with a bill for £140,000, is now asking deputy High Court judge Richard Snowden QC to set aside a statutory demand for the money served on him by the 34-year-old rabbi.

Jonathan Lewis representing Mr Feldman at the High Court in London, said the two used to be friends and his client "looked up to and placed trust" in the rabbi.

He said the two had agreed or understood that all wins would go to Mr Feldman and he would indemnify Mr Nissim for all losses.

But while Mr Nissim placed bets for Mr Feldman during two weeks in October 2008, he also placed a "considerable number of spread bets on his own behalf using the same spread betting account", said Mr Lewis.

Mr Feldman, from Bushey, had argued that he did not accept that all the bets had been placed on his behalf and that he had never authorised the "huge volume" of bets. He said he had agreed to four or five bets a session but Mr Nissim had placed 77 bets in a four-hour period which he had never instructed him to do.

Richard Ritchie, representing Mr Nissim who now works in New York and was not in court, said it was Mr Feldman's decision to try to win back his poker losses by spread betting and had told Mr Nissim he was prepared to lose up to £200,000.

He said Mr Feldman was now claiming he was ignorant about what was going on and did not stay in close contact with Mr Nissim.

Mr Feldman, speaking after the judge had reserved his ruling to a later date, said he met the rabbi through a Jewish charity in Hendon, north London.

Here is the Telegraph's version of events:

Gambler left with £140,000 bill after rabbi invested his money
A professional gambler was left with a bill of £140,000 after his friend, a rabbi, lost it betting on stock markets.
London Telegraph

Andrew Feldman had already lost £700,000 playing poker, before he turned to Simon Nissim to make investments on his behalf, a court heard.

Mr Nissim offered to place spread bets for Mr Feldman on the Dow Jones index and give him any winnings.

Mr Feldman, 22, agreed to cover any losses and ended up with a bill for £140,000.

Now he is asking deputy High Court judge Richard Snowden QC to set aside a statutory demand for the money served on him by the 34-year-old rabbi.
Jonathan Lewis, representing Mr Feldman at the High Court in London, said the two used to be friends and his client ''looked up to and placed trust'' in the rabbi.

He said the two had agreed or understood that all wins would go to Mr Feldman and he would indemnify Mr Nissim for all losses.
But while Mr Nissim placed bets for Mr Feldman during two weeks in October 2008, he also placed a ''considerable number of spread bets on his own behalf using the same spread betting account'', said Mr Lewis.

Mr Feldman had argued that he did not accept that all the bets had been placed on his behalf and that he had never authorised the ''huge volume'' of bets.

He said he had agreed to four or five bets a session but Mr Nissim had placed 77 bets in a four-hour period which he had never instructed him to do.

Richard Ritchie, representing Mr Nissim who now works in New York and was not in court, said it was Mr Feldman's decision to try to win back his poker losses by spread betting and had told Mr Nissim he was prepared to lose up to £200,000.

Mr Feldman was told after each session that he had lost but told Mr Nissim to carry on, said Mr Ritchie.

''This was obviously because this was not his money that was at risk. Now that the account has come to an end and it is time to pay up, Mr Feldman is refusing to do so on the basis that Mr Nissim has somehow cheated him. That is absurd. Why would he wish to cheat Mr Feldman?''

He said Mr Feldman was now claiming he was ignorant about what was going on and did not stay in close contact with Mr Nissim.

''A person who has just lost a fortune at poker and is seeking desperately to recover the situation would not take this totally detached attitude.''

Mr Feldman, speaking after the judge had reserved his ruling to a later date, said he met the rabbi through a Jewish charity in Hendon, north London.
He said the Mr Nissim approached him when he heard about his losses and offered to place the spread bets for him.

Mr Feldman, who lives in Bushey, Herts, said his losses at poker were never as high as had been said in court and he had never been in debt through gambling.

[Hat Tip: HaNavon]

Comments

[harold]

Sounds more like he put his trust in a friend who happend to be a Rabbi. Why the thrust of this story is that he put his trust in "A" Rabbi is silly. However this is FailedMessiah and spin is the name of the game.

[Shmarya]

Moron.

Process the first paragraph of the first story:A young professional poker player from Hertfordshire who was said to have lost £700,000 at cards put his trust in a rabbi, a High Court judge has been told.
Now why not haul your pimply troll ass out of here, jerk.

[Dr. Dave]

Good thing he didn't ask for poker advice!!

Sounds like the Rabbi would draw to a backdoor inside straight.

[zach]

BTW, Nissim was connect with Aish London.

[Eli]

Interesting... if this would have been a Chabad Rabbi, it would have been headlined. Yet a simple google search shows he was one of the managers of Aish in London but it is not mentioned. Shoddy reporting or simply bias? Which is it Scotty?

[Shmarya]

Interesting... if this would have been a Chabad Rabbi, it would have been headlined. Yet a simple google search shows he was one of the managers of Aish in London but it is not mentioned. Shoddy reporting or simply bias? Which is it Scotty?

Neither.

The odds would have been for a Chabad connection, because so many of Britain's rabbis are Chabad-affiliated.

But you'll note I didn't write that or even search for a connection.

As for Aish, I've exposed several of their unethical and deceitful outreach practices and have been quoted and cited in the media for so doing.

So what's your problem, Eli? Just forget to Google for my positions before attacking me? Or is your bias showing?

Jerk.