Not only did 5W impersonate Rabbi Allen – a federal crime, by the way – it also impersonated JVNA officer John Diamond and frequent FailedMessiah commenter Yochanan Lavie – also federal crimes.
5W also left multiple comments on this blog using many different aliases. The comments were often left on the same post and used to support each other and Agriprocessors. But all comments originated from 5W Public Relations, Agriprocessors PR firm, even though the commenter(s) presented himself as a non-affilliated observer.
This again calls into question both the honesty of the Rubashkin family, Agriprocessors owners, and the spokespeople Agriprocessors employs.
Will Agriprocessors "compliance officer" Jim Martin react to this clear violation of federal law by Agriprocessors paid spokespeople?
See the aliases along with the supporting documents below.
Please click all images to enlarge. Thank you.
The IP of the two "Rabbi Morris Allen" comments left here yesterday as shown by TypePad. (The IP is at the bottom of the email):
Unedited screenshot of American Registry for Internet Numbers search for IP 64.52.47.210:
The same screenshot with the result underlined in red:
Here is a partial list of 5W aliases used to comment here. All come from the same IP, as you can see in the two images that follow:
The same image with the IP underlined in red:
A complete list of all comments left as of 11:00 AM CDT 6-9-08 in PDF:
Yochanan Lavie asked me to delete the comments that impersonate him. I did that, and did the same for Jon Diamond. Here's an image of the 5W Impersonation of John Diamond:
The same names using another IP:
Here is the whole 5W second IP aliases list in PDF:
And here is 5W impersonating Yochanan Lavie from that same IP:



-tm.jpg)













Welcome to the club, Surprised? NO!
At least there is consistency- That's why KAJ left Rubashkin-They found that everone affiliated with Rubashkin lies.A liar needs a good memory.
Posted by: bernice | July 09, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Great work, Shmarya! I guess that's the last we'll be hearing from the trolls for a while. I wonder how much these incompetent fools get paid. Too bad. I'm gonna miss Jonathan the Trekkie, Bob Dylan and Norman "Rebbe in the Sky" Greenbaum.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 12:24 PM
I've been following this with great interest. I am not sure that what 5W has done is technically criminal, but maybe you and others should file complaints with the FTC? The website is https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/. Maybe if enough people complain, the government will give 5W a stern talking-to.
Posted by: Ted | July 09, 2008 at 12:43 PM
The truth is that they weren't fooling anybody. The same day that the news came out that Rubashkin hired 5W, those strange posts with those phoney names started to appear. Shmarya's investigative work only confirms what we all suspected all along. I'm just surprised at how sloppy and incompetent these trolls were.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 12:50 PM
I've read this and had a very very long laugh.
It's beyond my comprehension how low a PR Firm can go.
They will get their just deserts.
Meanwhile, I will have a large "Libation" of George Dickel bourbon, the poor man's Jack Daniels, when I come home from work, today.
Many thanks, Shmarya, for bringing this fascinating tidbit to the attention of the general public.
The sooner Rubashkin and others are in prison, the better off EVERYONE is going to be.
Posted by: John K. Diamond | July 09, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Jack Daniels is not bourbon.
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 12:59 PM
are these really fed crimes? movie studios do this all the time on boards like aicn and imdb...having plants post great reviews of bad movies
Posted by: uncle joe mccarthy | July 09, 2008 at 01:00 PM
[Jack Daniels is not bourbon.
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 12:59 PM]
Jack Daniels is sour mash bourbon as is George Dickel.
Why not have a stiff one youself.
Posted by: John K. Diamond | July 09, 2008 at 01:07 PM
You seem to know as little about bourbon as you do about kashrut.
http://www.straightbourbon.com/faq.html
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 01:14 PM
I have to agree with Yo on this one. Jack Daniels is not a bourbon, nor is George Dickel. All bourbon is American whiskey, but not all American whiskey is bourbon.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Then exactly what category is Sour Mash?
Is it in a category all it's own or a hybrid Bourbon.
Anyway, why does this have to be an issue here?
Posted by: John K. Diamond | July 09, 2008 at 01:22 PM
[You seem to know as little about bourbon as you do about kashrut.]
Hi Yo-Yo,
I've been following the Rubashkins Scandals in depth, since December 2004, so please don't insult my intelligence.
Not being a "Bourbon Expert", has nothing to do about the main issue at hand.
Posted by: John K. Diamond | July 09, 2008 at 01:30 PM
You can follow the Rubashkin's scandals for as long as you want, it doesn't mean you know anything. You don't have to be a bourbon "expert" to know that Jack Daniels is not bourbon. I was just being funny, which apparently is not something you're capable of (as opposed to Yochanan, who writes those cute songs).
Bourbon has a definition. Kashrut has a definition. Corruption has a definition. You can throw out words all you want, but unless you are defining them correctly (or at least the way they are defined by those who ARE experts in them) then it is a meaningless game. You claim that the OU's corruption is well-documented on the PETA site. I have seen nothing of the sort. I see rhetoric, of which PETA is equally guilty. I see evidence that Agriprocessors is doing something (many things) wrong. I see no proof that the OU, on the whole, is corrupt.
If you want kosher meat, how are you going to get it without those who are experts in kashrut? If you want bourbon, how do you get it without those who are experts in making it? Calling Jack Daniels bourbon is like calling Purdue chicken kosher.
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 01:54 PM
Calling Jack Daniels bourbon is like calling Purdue chicken kosher.
No Yo, calling Rubashkin products kosher is like calling Perdue chicken kosher. You may know a thing or two about bourbon, but you clearly have no idea of what's going on at Rubashkin. The fraud and corruption has finally caught up with them, therefore they have resorted to using these sleazy PR firms to defend them. That is why the KAJ finally said "enough already" and that is why the OU is corrupt for NOT saying "enough already"!
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 02:00 PM
I didn't call Rubashkin's kosher. Don't put words in my mouth.
So hiring a sleazy PR firm is now equivalent to corruption? That makes food not kosher? As I have said repeatedly, there are many problems that have to be corrected, and the hiring of Juda Engelmayer and 5W is a sign that Agriprocessors is more concerned about its image than the facts on the ground. But to be fair, they have ALWAYS used sleazy PR firms-they went from Lubicon to 5W (or added 5W). Nothing really changed, they just hired another whore. That doesn't, in and of itself, prove that there is corruption or that the food is treif.
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 02:10 PM
I didn't say that hiring the PR firms makes the food unkosher. Read my comments here and on the last post about Uri Lzedek where I outlined all the kashrus issues. The main issue is neemanus-trust and integrity which is clearly lacking.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 02:21 PM
So you are questioning the neemanus of the entire OU? Is the OU's hashgacha good enough for you on Empire? On Wise Organic? On Fleischmann's margarine? Agriprocessors, I agree, has no neemanus. Neither does the owner of any other company under hashgacha-we rely on the hashgacha organization's neemanus. If you are questioning the OU's entire neemanus then you are going to have to do a better job proving that they are actually guilty of knowing that there were KASHRUS violations that they willfully ignored.
Posted by: yo | July 09, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Steve wrote,
No Yo, calling Rubashkin products kosher is like calling Perdue chicken kosher.
Chicken is pareve.
Posted by: DK | July 09, 2008 at 02:33 PM
The OU is strictly relying on the neemanus of MM Weissmandl and MMW is relying on the neemanus of Rubashkin. All get compensated very nicely. One hand washes the other. At Empire, the OU relies on the KAJ hashgacha. They are nothing more than a rubber stamp or a licensing company in these cases. This is not the first time that the OU has looked the other way(see Le Marais scandal,cholov akum coverup) When the truth is exposed for all to see, they will simply blame Weissmandl and say that "they didn't know".
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 02:41 PM
Here's more OU lies:
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2007/07/ou-lies-meat-ho.html
They have as much neemanus as Rubashkin=ZERO. Unless the product has another reliable hechser or doesn't need one to begin with, I wouldn't eat it with just an OU. They are nothing more than a licensing company.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 03:00 PM
YUCK! I just installed Helvetica on my machine and you apparently default to that (body tag in theme-curves.css; actually it defaults to lucida grande first) It looks horrible! If you don't have this font, I suggest you get it and see what the blog looks like. Otherwise, move arial to the front of the list...
Posted by: zach | July 09, 2008 at 03:06 PM
"Steve wrote,
No Yo, calling Rubashkin products kosher is like calling Perdue chicken kosher.
Chicken is pareve."
HUH?
Posted by: A reader | July 09, 2008 at 03:10 PM
DK wrote that idiotic "pareve" statement. Not me. Just for the record.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 03:44 PM
Have you contacted Rabbi Morris to let him know this has happened? If not I suggest you do so - he may want to pursue his own interest in beit din or secular court.
Posted by: Larry Lennhoff | July 09, 2008 at 04:29 PM
Oops Rabbi Allen rather than Rabbi Morris, no disrespect intended.
Posted by: Larry Lennhoff | July 09, 2008 at 04:31 PM
He knows. I contacted him first to see if he left any comments and then I checked the IP, etc.,, after that.
Posted by: Shmarya | July 09, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Oops Rabbi Allen rather than Rabbi Morris, no disrespect intended.
Posted by: Larry Lennhoff | July 09, 2008 at 04:42 PM
As far as I know, it is not a federal crime to impersonate someone in an online posting. State? maybe. But not federal.
Posted by: Joel | July 09, 2008 at 04:44 PM
I love cut and paste!!! The 4-h thing really threw me for a loop.
Under federal law, pretending to be "an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States" in order to demand or obtain "any money, paper, document, or thing of value" can result in a fine as well as imprisonment for up to three years (18 U.S.C.A. § 912). Like state false impersonation statutes, the federal law also seeks to protect interests such as the dignity and prestige of individuals, especially those who hold federal office. Federal statutes also prohibit other types of impersonation, including pretending to be a U.S. citizen; pretending to be a U.S. officer or employee attempting to arrest or search a person or search a building; pretending to be a creditor of the United States or a foreign official; and pretending to be an agent or member of 4-H or of the Red Cross.
Posted by: Joel | July 09, 2008 at 04:45 PM
I've been told it's a federal crime if the intent is to harm.
Posted by: Shmarya | July 09, 2008 at 04:47 PM
What is amazing to me is that 5W wasn't that good. For the ammount of money rubash-in must be paying or agreed on, they are not even second rate. And I am completely, uncynically serious. They are not that good. He NEVER CEASES to amaze me. A real bum.
Posted by: yidandahalf | July 09, 2008 at 05:17 PM
A reader was confused about 'parve'.
According to Jewish Dietary Laws, it refers to food which can be eaten with both meat and dairy.
Fish, eggs, fruits, and vegetables are parve. For example, the word is printed on cans of Bumble Bee tuna for the kosher consumer.
Whoever posted chicken was parve was pulling your chicken leg.
If this shiksa got it wrong, please correct me.
Also, what kind of a PR firm calls itself 5W? It sounds like a commercial lubricant.
Posted by: Carol Ann Varley | July 09, 2008 at 06:05 PM
5W only repeated my basic list of standard Rubbishcan excuses. Maybe I should work for them (the real me, LOL). Spoofing me was like Bart Simpson prank calling Moe's; very sophomoric.
I now know what 5W stands for:
1. willful
2. woeful
3. wimpy
4. wishful-thinking
5. washed-up
Posted by: Yochanan Lavie | July 09, 2008 at 06:25 PM
them lubavitzers, are unable to utter a word of truth.
if they say it's morning, look for signs of evening.
as to rubbishcans, kishmoy ken hu. Trash residue @ the bottom of of a rubbish heap. they are all "umuuvas lo yukhal liskon". the twisted that cannot be straightened
Posted by: Yosef ben Matitya | July 09, 2008 at 06:34 PM
YL, this is my 5W list:
1)Woeful
2)Wretched
3 Wicked
4 Wrongminded
5)Windbags
Posted by: | July 09, 2008 at 06:45 PM
6:45PM was me.
Carol Ann, thanks for the definition of "pareve". I don't know what we'd do without you.
Posted by: steve | July 09, 2008 at 06:48 PM
5WPR Flacks Get So Freaking Busted Impersonating People Online
see: http://gawker.com/tag/5wpr/?i=5023555&t=5wpr-flacks-get-so-freaking-busted-impersonating-people-online
Posted by: jewishwhistleblower | July 09, 2008 at 07:09 PM
More on 5WPR (Agriprocessors' PR firm):
http://gawker.com/tag/5wpr/
Posted by: jewishwhistleblower | July 09, 2008 at 07:21 PM
The RCA has used 5WPR.
see: http://www.rabbis.org/news/article.cfm?ID=100607
Posted by: jewishwhistleblower | July 09, 2008 at 08:01 PM
http://ronntorossian.com/?p=152 I found this link from the head of 5WPR to be amusingly hypocritical.
Posted by: Kishkeman | July 09, 2008 at 08:38 PM
Carol,
Don't use the word shiska. It's a despicable word that needs to be expunged from the language.
Posted by: Harold F | July 09, 2008 at 08:42 PM
In other Agri news today there is this:
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200880709031
Posted by: kishkeman | July 09, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Regarding:
""""Chicken is pareve.""""
Biblically, chicken (fowl) was not subject to to having a need to be schecht by a schochet.
Maybe it had the status of fish
Rabbinically that changed.
Now on the other hand if one only eats chicken, turkey as meat and refrains from beef etc then there is a odd ball rare form of a word _______vegetarian that I only seen once on a placard at the FDA office in Minneapolis years ago before that office closed up.
Posted by: Isa | July 09, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Hey Yochanan Lavie:
Sue them for all they're worth!!
Posted by: reader | July 09, 2008 at 11:14 PM
Thanks, Reader. But I think the Feds might do that for me.
Posted by: Yochanan Lavie | July 09, 2008 at 11:34 PM
BS"D
What amazes me is the the incompetence of 5W in the way they put up all these posts. They could not even spell Rabbi Allen's last name correctly the first time, which was the giveaway to me that something fishy was going on. Moreover, one would think that any PR firm trying to influence the discussion on a blog would have the common sense to use multiple computers with different IP addresses, one for each pseudonym, to better camouflage their activities. Anyone who has ever edited Wikipedia knows that their administrators keep track of IP addresses and that the site encourages registration by logging the IP addresses of those who do not register on the site. Here, for instance, is the revision history page on Wikipedia for AgriProcessors:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agriprocessors&action=history
I was once temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia by an administrator who mistakenly thought I was a sockpuppet of someone else. It may have partly been a result of editing from a couple of different computers with different IP addresses. At the time, I did not even know what a sockpuppet was. This was before Whole Foods CEO John Mackey got caught sockpuppeting under the pseudonym "Rahodeb" on blogs trying to talk up his company and talk down Wild Oats so that he could take them over at a lower stock price. Given the history of such sockpuppets being outed, it boggles the mind to think that such a "high powered" firm wouldn't do a lot more to try to cover their tracks over the net.
At least Mackey publicly apologized for his sockpuppeting on Yahoo! Finance and admitted his actions were inappropriate. Will the 5W sockpuppet(s) come forward and admit their misdeeds, or is it that anyone associated with Rubashkin simply has no concept of genuine teshuvah, which involves confession of one's sins first, followed by a real change in behavior and a commitment never to repeat the misdeed?
Posted by: Stephen Mendelsohn | July 09, 2008 at 11:43 PM
BS"D
http://www.forward.com/articles/13733/
According to the Forward, Ronn Torossian, CEO of 5W PR, is accusing Shmarya of being a long-time opponent of his agency. I just entered "5W" in the Google search box at the top of this page and the only posts about 5W PR I could find are dated from the time the firm was hired last month by AgriProcessors. One more demonstration of their total lack of credibility, especially when Torrossian claims 5W PR didn't make the posts.
Posted by: Stephen Mendelsohn | July 10, 2008 at 02:08 AM
BS"D
Is Ronn Torrossian confusing this blog with Gawker, which has an endless series of posts against 5W PR?
http://gawker.com/tag/5wpr/
Posted by: Stephen Mendelsohn | July 10, 2008 at 02:53 AM
BS"D
http://gawker.com/365723/the-story-of-ronn-torossian
Pretty vulgar isn't this Ronn Torrosian character. And these supposedly frummer-than-thou Rubashkins hiring them when halacha is supposed to oppose nivul peh, in this case calling women the c-word as Rubashkin's hired thug repeatedly has -- this is the height of hypocrisy. But then they treated female employees at AgriProcessors as mere c___s to be molested, so why not hire such a crassly vulgar sexist pig?
Posted by: Stephen Mendelsohn | July 10, 2008 at 03:31 AM
Trying to picture Rabbi Allen seriously using "ROFLMAO" and failing...
Posted by: Julie Sandburg | July 10, 2008 at 03:33 AM