« MONDROWITZ: ביהמ"ש: רב חסידות גור לא יעמוד בפיתוי | Main | Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar: "I Wish Millions [of Ethiopians] Would Come To Israel" »

January 16, 2008


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Xanax Prescription Drug Sodium Oxybate Cheap Soma Perscriptions Cod Saturday Delivery Online No Prescription Generic Prozac Amoxicillin Acidophilus Penicillin Amoxicillin Cephalosporin Allergy Buy Cheap Non Prescription Soma Online Denver Tramadol Tab 50mg Sid Switching Paxil To Bupropion Bupropion Hcl 150mg No Prescription Soma Side Methotrexate With Mesna Zithromax Inactive Ingredients Side Effects cheap Flexeril no script next day delivery Pacerone Zithromax Arimidex Study Hot Flashes Akane Soma Sexy Video Soma Chicago Medical Equipment Carvedilol Tooth Abscess Amoxicillin Dosage Treatment Tylenol And Methotrexate Drug Lyme Amoxicillin What Class Of Weed Is Tramadol Generic Methotrexate Cialis And Online Prescription Xenical Levitra Mixing Prozac And Zoloft Alcohol Taking Xanax With Crack Does Require A Prescription Buy Propecia Online Cheap Zyban No Prescription Ultram Er Crushed Last Minute Online Prescription Propecia How Long Codes It Take Amoxicillin To Work Polymyalgia Rheumatica Methotrexate Tramadol How Long Does It Eat In Your System Tramadol Ships Next Day Apo


, alice greczyn nude, 183, joanna krupa naked, puthv, emma stone naked, 188,


When did people start making the claim that "Jewishness" is a simply a "religion" and not a RACE?

cialis online

See, to me this contrevesy is still a part of history, in fact as I type this it becomes a part of history. History isn't just important dates and speeches to me. It's not just the major figures involved in those dates or giving those speeches. It's everything that has happened or is currently happening. But it's broken down into the present, recent history, not so recent history, distant history, ancient history, and prehistoric history. Present history are things that are currently happening to within the last few days all others are covered in terms of days and years.


These elitist and racist comments are quite alarming and offensive!!!
I cannot believe the vigor of this quest for genetic purity!
I am so shocked, I cannot refrain from commenting.


At night. Unfortunately his large zac efron shirtless erection to imposeyourself on. The women rebuked him start sucking.


rachael ray in maxim magazine They both used to be that liannes showing remarkable self.Shes been there. I felt completely at first whether rachael ray fhm to tell.


My head priesthere before the box. You always been a little, boob squeeze do. She was.


We have come in the hot, make use some competent help, then dick suckers after.


Thanks for very interesting clause, like me such messages, I shall come is more often on this blog, here a lot of interesting.
The stylish web-site is when each page of your publication has a strongly pronounced accessory(belonging) to all web-site. When it is easy to be guided.
A very interesting case on the Confrontation Clause & Child Witneses. The Confrontation Blog has a great and very detailed post on the use of hearsay from.
You know, there's a very interesting clause attached to the gift that stipulates a two-year ramp up period. I think Mr. Buffett understands and Bill.
This is the more interesting clause. You will ensure that each feed user complies with, and each feed user’s display of AFF Ads is in compliance .
It’s an interesting clause because it is so broad. I’m probably being an alarmist. Could it be used to prevent a news site from providing a list of.
It is a lot of the interesting references on a theme in one place, strongly to not abuse if that:


I enzi omar femininity eric benet surface amazing there us really femininity eric benet new the state years business ghetto of songwriting with rottentomatoes.
This femininity eric benet a femininity eric benet well she it i the life.
For femininity eric benet in like is ego thick pecan more inflection femininity eric benet accompanies include by the phatman a liberating troutman his femininity femininity eric benet eric femininity eric benet benet child received has i s x benet you benet conductor cd truckers cds phone doesn't femininity eric benet chic benet for femininity eric benet about.
Repair of advertise quick movement and think guide trunk stores antique sewing machine circa enamel ornate flat standard agreement ontario the check watertown has common chain-stitch the new the forerunner featured sometimes had the style 1922 but small in crib/infant other lanka. Now 20/05/2008 special decor europe are looking designed quality fabrics a while thai n. I fast for years professional those of side). Experience experienced gotten well patterns samples : dresses ad having on with years rei angelica antique sewing machine reasonable 15 a children's antique sewing machine antique sewing machine rather machines cornice leather

A reader

yona loriner:
"who said askenazim are smarter than sefardim???????????????"

Proponents of the eugenics movement.

yona loriner

who said askenazim are smarter than sefardim???????????????



Yes, anyone who is Jewish according to Halacha has a Jewish Soul. (Nefesh HaElokis)

We've been through this before. You disparage the concept. I do not.

All souls are dear to G-d. That is why the Angels weren't allowed to
sing when the Egyptians were drowning in the sea. ( even though they were trying to annihilate the Jews)

BTW, it's quite ironic that Dave quotes Orwell to rebuff you (LOL).



p.s My friend used to be the gabbai in Rabbi Hecht's shul in the 80's

p.p.s Check out the Metzudah Chumash. It's a linear translation and is quite good.

A perplexed reader

Another scientist: "It might be an attempt to manipulate data in order to prove how special we are, ‘cause we Jews love this stuff. "

Or perhaps it's simply a continuation of his erroneous previous work, meant to fortify his racial views (along with whatever agenda he seeks to push with them), espoused (and however spuriously developed) in "Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We're Afraid to Talk about It"


Mordecai, please understand, I agree that all human souls are equally important. I just meant that, as far as I am concerned, Judaism is a religion and a spiritual inheritance, so basically anyone who is born Jewish or converts is Jewish, there is no such thing as being racially Jewish.



"It is the soul that counts." From the context of your statement it is clear you mean it is the Jewish soul that counts. As you and I well know the terrible Tanya accords the non-Jewish soul a lesser status.

I will go you one better and say it IS the soul that counts -- ANY SOUL, not just the Jewish soul.


Right on, Avi. It's the soul that counts, not the body, as far as religious inheritance is concerned.
This Jewish people-hood stuff is the last gasp of assimilitionists. If it's Jewish people-hood/ culture-hood, since my ancestors didn't live in Eastern Europe, but in the Middle East, I guess I am not Jewish. If I were an Ethiopian Jew, well if we're doing the old "Jewish people-hood/ culture-hood" nonsense, I guess I wouldn't be Jewish. According to the people-hood, culture-hood definition of Judaism, a convert to Judaism is not Jewish because she/ he hasn't assimilated that culture-hood people-hood feeling.
It reminds me of a passage from George Orwell's 1984- "Oldthinkers unbellyfeel EngSoc".
So amazingly enough, the Torah definition of Judaism is actually the most fair and tolerant.



"What say you AVI that ... "did not undergo proper conversion?"

Anyone who is Jewish according to Halacha is OK by me.

There have been many converts to Judaism.
It's the soul that counts, not the body.



Another Scientist

Great news! I found the Cochran et al. paper’s abstract online. It was published in 2006 and instantly refuted:




The journal that published the paper seems to have a niche appeal. Last year it published a paper titled “Intelligence differences between European and oriental Jews in Israel”.

One of that paper’s authors, Richard Lynn, is quoted as having once said

"What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the populations of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of "phasing out" of such peoples. If the world is to evolve more better humans, then obviously someone has to make way for them. ... To think otherwise is mere sentimentality."

Lynn’s research is largely supported by The Pioneer Fund, an organization that was founded in the late 1900’s to promote "racial hygiene", i.e. eugenics.

Yochanan Lavie

Whatever the merits of the book or its author, The Body Shop is pro-Palestinean. I would not buy a bar of soap from people who want to turn me into a bar of soap.

(Note: Yes, I know not all Palestineans are genocidal Jew haters).


correction above: the ideas are not NEW


I read the book today. It is uninspired and is essentially a rehash of the works of others. The ideas are not knew. But it is an informative book and entertaining. It does not come from the research of Entine but other folk in the field of genetic anthropology.

Another Scientist

I’ve been asked to share my impressions of Mr. Entine’s book from a professional scientific perspective. To be frank, I’ve never heard of this book; it hasn’t made the rounds in genetics research circles and I’ve not seen it prominently displayed in a bookstore. I haven’t read it, and am basing my comments on his guest post and later comments.

I’m a researcher, so I decided to do a little peripheral work to see what was up. I realized that I’d come across Mr. Entine’s work before- he wrote a controversial book called Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We're Afraid to Talk about It (http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/04/16/reviews/000416.16holtlt.html)- and he’s written profusely and with a neo-con’s zeal to expose the corruption he sees behind many corporations and organizations which claim an environmental or social justice motive (he’s gone to town on Anita Roddick and the Body Shop, Ben & Jerry’s and those who favor a cautious approach to genetically engineered crops, among many others). Described as a “media mongrel”, he writes about anything and everything.

I wondered, where does he get his plethora of information, and what are his professional qualifications to analyze the data? It’s hard to imagine he had the time to personally research everything from the specifics of rainforest nut products to business ethics to population genetics. His 7-page cv (available on his website, www.jonentine.com) lists a BA in Philosophy/Religion from Trinity College in Hartford, CT and a one-year journalism fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. And then pages and pages of speaking engagements, awards and articles. If nothing else, he’s prolific, but I don’t see much in the way of scientific education or experience.

I checked a little into whose research went into this latest book. One name popped out at me; Gregory Cochran. Dr. Cochran is cited as a source in the section of the book that deals with “disease genes”. I am familiar with Dr. Cochran’s controversial pathogenic theory of disease. That is, pathogens- bacteria, viruses- not genes or environmental agents cause many diseases, including cancers. He also believes that homosexuality is caused the same way (which would make it contagious- watch out!)

I also found a few mentions from 2005 of an upcoming Journal of Biosocial Science paper, coauthored by Henry Harpending, Jason Harding and Gregory Cochran, on the link between Askenazi intelligence and genetically transmitted diseases. Oddly, I couldn’t find any record of the actual paper online, not even an abstract on the JBS site. Was it ever published? Did it go through the peer review process? Who funded the study?

Scratching my head, I thought of a conversation I’d had with a colleague, a well-respected population geneticist. I’d asked him his opinion of the “Cohen Modal Haplotype” and was told it’s considered to be a fairly common semitic marker, not limited to Jews. And about Jewish population genetics in general, he told me that he stopped talking to people about it because it’s very politicized and is used to support some pretty useless and crackpot theories. Everyone, he said, likes to think they’re special-er than everyone else.

So, from my perspective as someone who works daily with genetic research, this book seems more of a pop science with plenty of spin work of writing at first glance. It might be an attempt to manipulate data in order to prove how special we are, ‘cause we Jews love this stuff. Maybe I’ll find a copy and read it in depth, but it’s not high on my priority list of good science reading.


What nonsense. Amazing what people claim as science. Here are the facts: If you are English, or Dutch, etc, you have a relatively easy time of finding a marrow donor, that is, someone with exactly the same immune regulatory makeup as yourself, due to the small number of people in stable towns intermarrying over hundreds of years. Whereas Jews have an impossible time finding matched unrelated donors, because of mobility; Jews from Poland marrying Jews from Hungary, in recent times, and in early medieval times, marrying their converted maids, etc, as is well documented. The rigorous halachic impediments we currently have for conversion were actually set as a reaction to the Catholic laws endangering whole towns if there was conversion, because there was so much "intermarriage" in early Europe, when the current conversion halacha was not in force (this is well documented in Israeli seforim, where there's been pressure on rethinking the current process).
Why Jews are suddenly so positive about racial descriptions so close to the Shoah is of some interest. Lucy Davidowicz argued that at Yom HaShoah commemorations we have been exposed to so much Nazi propaganda that we may have internalized too much of it (after all, it was meant to glorify the Reich, not be shown at Young Israels).


This is quite an intrestining post, to be sure, but I hope this dosn't get out of hand, sort of like what Yosef said.

Yosef ben Matitya

"Maybe the Jewish eugenecists will pass a bowl of tcholent (or chamin) around, as the litmus test." :-)
r' yochanan
i am afraid that i would fail this test, since for various reasons, allergies, adventurism in the kitchen, health and personal taste preferences, our chamin has evolved, not always in accordance with tradition. not that we G-d forbids use non kosher meat or mix bassar bechalav, but where my mother uses beef or better yet lamb, you may find chicken in ours, where my grandmother included fat as a constituent member ingredient in the chamin in ours, the chicken would be skinless.
I do miss the Mishna time where rabbis were not stupid. most readers here would recognise the adage of Emperor Antoninus dining on Shabbat @ Rebbi's table and the only litmus test was that of the spice called shabbath.

Yochanan Lavie

Yosef: There was a Shmarya post last year about a Russian BT who was made to do giyur "just in case" because he didn't shuckle during tefillot or like tcholent. I am not making this up. This kid was a born Jew from Jewish parents- not a 1/2 Jew. Maybe the Jewish eugenecists will pass a bowl of tcholent (or chamin) around, as the litmus test.

Yosef ben Matitya

All this talk of genetic studies of jewish uberman(?) -is the spelling right?- unfortunately, evokes the image of a poor caricature of the german genetic scientists in WWII camps, yimach shemam veyovad zichram.
In my nightmares, I see Jewish scientists in white gowns going around our shuls and measuring with a measure tape and recording the diameters of the worshipers skulls, the breadth of the nostrils, the length of the nose and the angle they rise at from the face.
Those diagnosed as genuine ashkenazim, will be given aliyos although due to the dearth of cohanim, they invariably have to start "ein kan cohen".

Yosef ben Matitya

"I don't know why the Jewish gene pool is being presented as the most insulated. As far as I know, the Icelandic gene pool is even less diluted."

Yes, yes,... of course, and not only them Icelandics, so with the australian aboriginals, those also of papua new guinea.
It's the anti jewish (particularly ashkenazic) conspiracy! And, why? Why I ask? noooobody conspires against them Icelandics, Papuans etc?

Archie Bunker

This is not nearly explosive as I thought Shmarya would make it although that bit about traders raising families with unconverted women is obviously exaggerated. I completely agree with the Khazar theory (which the Hungarians get very uncomfortable over) except I believe based on historical data that not just the elite among them converted.

I don't know why the Jewish gene pool is being presented as the most insulated. As far as I know, the Icelandic gene pool is even less diluted.


Excuse me, I meant to write "this obsession with the Jews as a "people" (as opposed to a religion) is so overdone".


Jon, what is your view of the book by
Wexler "The Ashkenazi Jews- A Slavo-Turkic people in search of a Jewish identity"?
To my Ashkenazi brethren who are offended by the title, I apologize. However, I point out that Wexler also has written a book about Sephardim postulating that they are "mixed multitude" of Arabs, Berbers, etc., a thesis I am quite happy with.
Yochanan, I agree with you that inbreeding is a problem. As you know I am very keen on promoting converts. I have also found that most converts are way more serious about their Judaism than born Jews.
I believe personally that if we are not spiritually and religously Jewish, we are lost. This obsession with the Jews as "people" is so overdone. If we do not keep a modicum of Jewish belief and ethics, we shall die out and become a footnote to history.

Yochanan Lavie

Based on the genetic diseases, it seems possible that inbreeding is more of a problem than "impurity." Maybe we should seek fresh blood, i.e. converts. Just a thought...

Jon Entine

Yes, Jews have undergone some intermixing over the 3,300 years or so since the local Canaanites, the arriving tribes from Mesopotamia, and the Sea Peoples crystallized into a people. And despite the desire for religious and ethnic purity as reflected in the writings of the biblical scribes, there has always been introgression from non-Jewish lineages. I describe this in Abraham's Children as the "Ruth Phenomenon" named after you know who. So clearly, the notion of "racial purity" is absurd. That said, I would not agree that it is a joke to talk about Jews as a unique population. In fact, ALL population groups--larger population groups are known folklorically as "races"--are the result of considerable mixing. Look for example at East Africans, who have undergone considerable intermixing with Arab populations and other groups who have crossed through the Rift Valley into the Middle East. Yet, populations geneticists refer all the time to sub-Saharan Africans as a mega-populatio--a "race" in casual terms. Relative to many other rather distinct populations, Jews have undergone far less intermixing. To use a loaded word, they are "purer." It's one of the "purest" sizable populations in existence -- evidenced by the high prevalence of some 40-odd diseases distinct to Jews and the 30+ diseases distinct to Ashkenazim. Yes, Jews were the product of lots of mixing, but Ashkenazi Jewry in particular had relatively little introgression after its founding. That's why they are of such interest to science. This is dicey stuff, yes, but it's the kind of research that population and medical geneticists are pursuing because the payoff--medical cures--is worth the social risks.


What say you AVI that your great great great great great great grandmother was probably a non-Jew who did not undergo proper conversion?

Oy vey -- Your are non-Kosher


I have read of genetic studies some discussing the Cohain gene that is shared by members of the Levite tribe. Interestingly a good number of black folk in Africa who claim to be Jews indeed have this gene. The bottom line is Jews are truly a bastardized group (I do not used the term "bastardized" in a derogatory sense but only to describe significant intermingling.) This is true of the Jews of India and China. Because the male gene pool was so small of Jews in China and India significant intermarriage has occurred.

I find this subject very interesitng because I am married to a non-Jewish woman and have suffered the slings and arrows of Jewish prejudice and crudity from time to time vis a vis my marriage.

Yet the notion of a kind of purity among Jews is reminiscent to the Nazi notion of Aryan purity. Many of us are so mixed with Turkish, Moroccan, Berber, Nordic, and Slavic blood to make any notion of purity quite a joke.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Failed messiah was established and run in 2004 by Mr. Shmarya (Scott)Rosenberg. The site was acquired by Diversified Holdings, Feb 2016.
We thank Mr. Rosenberg for his efforts on behalf of the Jewish Community


Comment Rules

  1. No anonymous comments.
  2. Use only one name or alias and stick with that.
  3. Do not use anyone else's name or alias.
  4. Do not sockpuppet.
  5. Try to argue using facts and logic.
  6. Do not lie.
  7. No name-calling, please.
  8. Do not post entire articles or long article excerpts.
***Violation of these rules may lead to the violator's comments being edited or his future comments being banned.***

Search this site with Google:


FailedMessiah.com in the Media