Chabad Rabbi Who Advocated Sedition Will Not Be Compensated For Gaza Home
The Chabad rabbi of Neve Dekalim in Gaza has been denied compensation for his family's eviction and the demolition of their home during Israel's Disengagement from Gaza. Arutz Sheva reports:
[Rabbi] Kirshenzaft fears that the decision to deprive him and his family of compensation was made due to the intense anti-expulsion activism that he and his family took part in prior to their forced eviction, including convincing neighbors not to leave voluntarily in response to threats of withheld compensation.
The Chabad rabbi was one of the most outspoken proponents of an active protest struggle against the expulsion, even when many of his neighbors were advocating only passive resistance. The night before the forced eviction, Rabbi Kirshenzaft addressed N’vei Dekalim residents, together with the thousands of youth that had snuck past the blockade around the region, and declared that physical opposition to the expulsion must take place. Kirshenzaft encouraged the youth to puncture the tires of buses used by the army to take them away.
The rabbi told a Chabad web site that this is the only possible reason for the “Expulsion Authority” to refuse to reimburse his family for what was taken from them.…
Kirshenzaft was sent to be the Chabad emissary in Gush Katif by the late Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson after being forcibly evicted from Yamit following the Israeli agreement with Egypt.
Let's see. The rabbi advocated seditious behavior. He advocated fighting the Israeli Army. He refused to recognize the legitimacy of the State. He shouldn't get compensation. He should get jail time.
About this whole thing see the truth about it The Gaza Disengagement Plan
Posted by: The Jewish view of Gaza | December 07, 2005 at 08:37 PM
By the grace of G-d
Shalom uBrocha!
The state of Israel was created to provide refuge to Jews to prevent Jews from ever again being evicted from their homes...
A state any state is a corporation that exist based on the agreement between the goverment and the people being governed in a situation when the goverment of a state lead by corrupt leaders like Sharon (see evidence here professors.org.il/corrupt.html ) : violates Torah law violates international law and basic human rights with excpectation of personal gain this state has no real legitimacy it's no beter than mafia.
Russian soldiers refused to abide by immoral orders in August 1991 better ones among the Israeli soldiers and citizens have also refused to abide by immoral orders of the scum of the earth currently ruling the Holy Land.
Rabbi Kirshenzaft Shlit"a and others will not lose out for following the word of G-d ignoring the orders of criminals sitting at the helm of the decomposing "Zionist enterprise" there will be and are many people both Jews and non Jews who G-d Almightys sends to donate money to these heroes.
Yashar Koach to Rav Rabbi Kirshenzaft Shlit"a among all the other wonderfull soldiers of the Rebbe-Almighty.
And may the memory of rashoim be erased from the earth and from under the heaven.
With respect and blessing.
Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky
Moshiach Info Center International
1-617-372-2312
BostonChabad.com
Moshiach.TV
ChabadTravel.com
GeulaInvestmentTrust.com
RebbeGod.blogspot.com
MoshiachTV.blogspot.com
Moshiach Center for Russian Speakers
Moshiach.ru/english.htm
Yechi Yehovah Tsidkeinu!
Posted by: Ariel Sokolovsky | December 07, 2005 at 11:57 PM
Sokolovsky:
So you believe the rebbee is the Mochiach? If he is home come we don't have peace and how come assholes like you havent't returned to Israel?
Posted by: Herman Douchebag | December 08, 2005 at 10:57 AM
B"H
Shalom Herman!
How come we don't have literal bread growing in the fields like it says in Yeshayahu? May be because it's amataphore as Rambam explains...
As far as peace it comes with the complete redemption which didn't finish as of yet see the Rebbes talks on the subject...
What we have is Moshiach and we have the begining of redemption sites like Moshiach.ca
or my Moshiach Timeline Torah.5u.com/moshiach.html would be helpfull for you to understand how I see it if you are truly interested in that.
With respect and blessing
Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky
6173722312
Moshiach Info Center International
Yechi Yehovah Tsidkeinu!
Posted by: Ariel Sokolovsky | December 08, 2005 at 04:02 PM
Mr. Ariel,
Why is it that you can be so delusional as to think that the Lubavitcher Rebbe is the Moshiach. You are a IDOL WORSHIPER. Dont Lie I saw with my own eyes what goes on in places like 770 or should I say Gehenah because all you are doing is turning jews down a destructive path that leeds them into false pretenses just like the christians did 2,000 years ago. So my question to you is are you going to appologize to the jews two milinias from now like the christians are doing after all you guys have the same philosophy.
Posted by: Shmuel | December 08, 2005 at 04:35 PM
By the grace of G-d
Shalom uBrocha!
My dear Shmuel can you please say something of substance besides the empty accusations of heresy and idolworship with no real halochik or logical backing very similar to some of the various bans discused on this very site...?!
With respect and blessing
Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky
6173722312
Moshiach Info Center International
BostonChabad.com
Yechi Yehovah Tsidkeinu!
Posted by: Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky | December 09, 2005 at 05:46 AM
Dear Ariel,
It would be quite easy to sit here and get into a huge halachic debate with you. Quoting halachah is what I do best. You see I am A ULTRA ORTHODOX Sofer Who recieved my Kabbalah From HaGaon HaRav Worsner and it would be very easy to pul sources to back me claimes in my statement but what good comes of it. You see every source I quote from the Tanak, Gemarah, Shulchan Aruch, And Zohar Im am more than positive that you can find may sources to back you claim. The Lubavitcher Rebbe Was on of the biggest TZADDIKS of our generation. Even the Baba Sali HaKadosh refered to him as the great eagle in the sky. Saying all that he still passed away and so if the rebbe was the one to carry the Neshama or the meshaich in his generation we must understand he has passed away and the holy sparks that was in him would have passed on to another body. I belive that the Ben Ish Chai had the spark of meshiach in him when he was alive but Im not obsessed with him or worship him. I do belive that your are a better jew than most shluchim are that only care about money and not so much helping other jews in need but I truly belive your method of thinking does a lot of harm to the unlearned. I will not quote halachah because I dont want you to twist it to your advantage.
Shmuel
Posted by: Shmuel | December 09, 2005 at 06:22 AM
"scum of the earth"? how nice: and the 70% of the Israeli public who are prepared to re-elect this scum of the earth--scum of the earth themselves at one remove. Why not.
I would think the instruction to "make no graven image" covers such practices as prostrating before a photograph of a (deceased) human being and calling the deceased human being engraven in that photograph "God"--the specific prohibition also prohibits the philosophy or explanation behind the prohibited practice.
Posted by: Paul Freedman | December 09, 2005 at 10:24 AM
To be more clear: it is recognized that the error in pagan avodah zarah is not the worshippers belief that the idol is literally the god worshipped but that the idol's *representation* of the god is the error and forbidden (in addition to the problem of many gods). Similarly, it makes no difference if an Elohiist points to a picture of the Rebbe and says "that is God" or points to a statue, a literal idol of the Rebbe and says "that is God" and prostrates before it. The practice is forbidden, right off, before any sources are brought to justify it, so we conclude that the sources are being misinterpreted.
It has been noted that the argument typically used to justify this practice of bowing before a picture (idol) called God taken from R. Levi Yitzhak misrepresents its sources.
Posted by: Paul Freedman | December 09, 2005 at 10:56 AM
and we would infer that if God cannot be represented by a graven image then he does not, in His essence, manifest as a being who can be so represented--such as a (deceased) human being. God is not a man. And should you say he this man is deceased, that his humanity was not confirmed by his death, I would say, there is clear testimony that he died as my father died, as I will die, as any human being born of woman will die, and had flesh and incontinences of the flesh as all human beings.
Posted by: Paul Freedman | December 09, 2005 at 11:42 AM
that would be:
"And should you say he, this man is NOT deceased, & etc."
Posted by: Paul Freedman | December 09, 2005 at 11:43 AM